In patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction, treatment with spironolactone did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; TOPCAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094302.).

Introduction Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome in need of improved phenotypic classification. We sought to evaluate whether unbiased clustering analysis using dense phenotypic data (“phenomapping”) could identify phenotypically distinct HFpEF categories. Methods and Results We prospectively studied 397 HFpEF patients and performed detailed clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic phenotyping of the study participants. We used several statistical learning algorithms, including unbiased hierarchical cluster analysis of phenotypic data (67 continuous variables) and penalized model-based clustering to define and characterize mutually exclusive groups comprising a novel classification of HFpEF. All phenomapping analyses were performed blinded to clinical outcomes, and Cox regression was used to demonstrate the clinical validity of phenomapping. The mean age was 65±12 years, 62% were female, 39% were African-American, and comorbidities were common. Although all patients met published criteria for the diagnosis of HFpEF, phenomapping analysis classified study participants into 3 distinct groups that differed markedly in clinical characteristics, cardiac structure/function, invasive hemodynamics, and outcomes (e.g., pheno-group #3 had an increased risk of HF hospitalization [hazard ratio 4.2, 95% CI 2.0–9.1] even after adjustment for traditional risk factors [P<0.001]). The HFpEF pheno-group classification, including its ability to stratify risk, was successfully replicated in a prospective validation cohort (n=107). Conclusions Phenomapping results in novel classification of HFpEF. Statistical learning algorithms, applied to dense phenotypic data, may allow for improved classification of heterogeneous clinical syndromes, with the ultimate goal of defining therapeutically homogeneous patient subclasses.

Background— Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction assigned to spironolactone did not achieve a significant reduction in the primary composite outcome (time to cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for management of heart failure) compared with patients receiving placebo. In a post hoc analysis, an ≈4-fold difference was identified in this composite event rate between the 1678 patients randomized from Russia and Georgia compared with the 1767 enrolled from the United States, Canada, Brazil, and Argentina (the Americas). Methods and Results— To better understand this regional difference in clinical outcomes, demographic characteristics of these populations and their responses to spironolactone were explored. Patients from Russia/Georgia were younger, had less atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus, but were more likely to have had prior myocardial infarction or a hospitalization for heart failure. Russia/Georgia patients also had lower left ventricular ejection fraction and creatinine but higher diastolic blood pressure (all P <0.001). Hyperkalemia and doubling of creatinine were more likely and hypokalemia was less likely in patients receiving spironolactone in the Americas with no significant treatment effects in Russia/Georgia. All clinical event rates were markedly lower in Russia/Georgia, and there was no detectable impact of spironolactone on any outcomes. In contrast, in the Americas, the rates of the primary outcome, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for heart failure were significantly reduced by spironolactone. Conclusions— This post hoc analysis demonstrated greater potassium and creatinine changes and possible clinical benefits with spironolactone in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from the Americas. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

No abstract

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, originally developed as glucose-lowering agents, have been shown to reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with type 2 diabetes without established heart failure, and in patients with heart failure with and without diabetes. Their role in patients with heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction remains unknown.

No abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine contemporary survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and to investigate whether or not the National Institutes of Health (NIH) equation remains an accurate predictor of survival.In 576 patients with PAH referred during 1991-2007, observed survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. In patients with idiopathic, familial and anorexigen-associated PAH (n5247), observed versus NIH equation predicted survival was compared. A new survival prediction equation was developed using exponential regression analysis.The observed 1-, 3-and 5-yr survival in the total cohort were 86, 69 and 61%, respectively. In patients with idiopathic, familial and anorexigen-associated PAH, the observed 1-, 3-and 5-yr survival (92, 75 and 66%, respectively) were significantly higher than the predicted survival (65, 43 and 32%, respectively). The new equation (P(t)5e, where P(t) is probability of survival, t the time interval in years, A(x,y,z)5e(-1.270-0.0148x+0.0402y-0.361z) , x the mean pulmonary artery pressure, y the mean right atrial pressure and z the cardiac index) performed well when applied to published contemporary studies of survival in PAH. Contemporary survival in the PAH cohort was better than that predicted by the NIH registry equation. The NIH equation underestimated survival in idiopathic, familial and anorexigenassociated PAH. Once prospectively validated, the new equation may be used to determine prognosis.KEYWORDS: National Institutes of Health equation, prognosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, survival P ulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a debilitating disease characterised by progressive obstruction and obliteration of the pulmonary arteries, eventually leads to right ventricular failure and death [1]. PAH can be idiopathic, familial or associated with other conditions, including connective tissue disease, congenital heart disease, portal hypertension, HIV and anorexigen exposure [1]. A landmark National Institutes of Health (NIH) registry study, published in 1987, described the clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), which included idiopathic, familial and anorexigen-associated PAH [2]. The NIH registry proposed an empirically derived equation, based on baseline haemodynamics, for the estimation of survival in patients with PPH [3].Subsequently, many clinical trials in PAH have used the NIH equation to suggest improvements in survival by comparing the observed survival rates on a study drug versus the survival rates predicted by the NIH equation [4][5][6][7][8][9].The NIH registry was initiated during a time when there were no US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for PAH. Patients in the NIH registry were treated only with conventional therapy, which included diuretics, digoxin, supplemental nasal oxygen and, in a minority of cases, anticoagulation with warfarin and/or vasodilators, such as calciumchannel blockers and hydralazine [2,3]. Since the mid-1980s, howeve...

BACKGROUND Nitrates are commonly prescribed to enhance activity tolerance in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. We compared the effect of isosorbide mononitrate or placebo on daily activity in such patients. METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind, crossover study, 110 patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction were randomly assigned to a 6-week dose-escalation regimen of isosorbide mononitrate (from 30 mg to 60 mg to 120 mg once daily) or placebo, with subsequent crossover to the other group for 6 weeks. The primary end point was the daily activity level, quantified as the average daily accelerometer units during the 120-mg phase, as assessed by patient-worn accelerometers. Secondary end points included hours of activity per day during the 120-mg phase, daily accelerometer units during all three dose regimens, quality-of-life scores, 6-minute walk distance, and levels of N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). RESULTS In the group receiving the 120-mg dose of isosorbide mononitrate, as compared with the placebo group, there was a nonsignificant trend toward lower daily activity (−381 accelerometer units; 95% confidence interval [CI], −780 to 17; P = 0.06) and a significant decrease in hours of activity per day (−0.30 hours; 95% CI, −0.55 to −0.05; P = 0.02). During all dose regimens, activity in the isosorbide mononitrate group was lower than that in the placebo group (−439 accelerometer units; 95% CI, −792 to −86; P = 0.02). Activity levels decreased progressively and significantly with increased doses of isosorbide mononitrate (but not placebo). There were no significant between-group differences in the 6-minute walk distance, quality-of-life scores, or NT-proBNP levels. CONCLUSIONS Patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction who received isosorbide mononitrate were less active and did not have better quality of life or submaximal exercise capacity than did patients who received placebo.