2006
DOI: 10.3141/1964-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heuristic Priority Ranking of Emergency Evacuation Staging to Reduce Clearance Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, a large number of evacuation studies are conducted using well-established dynamic traffic simulation models developed for regular day-to-day traffic applications, including both microscopic models, such as PARAMICS (Cova and Johnson 2003), CORSIM (Williams et al 2007), VISSIM (Han and Yuan 2005), and INTEGRA-TION (Mitchell and Radwan 2006), and mesoscopic or macroscopic models, such as DYNASMART (Murray-Tuite 2007), DynaMIT (Balakrishna et al 2008), DynusT (Noh et al 2009), TransCAD (Wang et al 2010), and INDY (Klunder et al 2009). In a number of studies using microscopic models, model parameters describing driving behaviour (such as headway, acceleration, reaction time) have been adjusted for the case of emergency evacuation (e.g., Tu et al 2010).…”
Section: Past and Current Evacuation Traffic Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, a large number of evacuation studies are conducted using well-established dynamic traffic simulation models developed for regular day-to-day traffic applications, including both microscopic models, such as PARAMICS (Cova and Johnson 2003), CORSIM (Williams et al 2007), VISSIM (Han and Yuan 2005), and INTEGRA-TION (Mitchell and Radwan 2006), and mesoscopic or macroscopic models, such as DYNASMART (Murray-Tuite 2007), DynaMIT (Balakrishna et al 2008), DynusT (Noh et al 2009), TransCAD (Wang et al 2010), and INDY (Klunder et al 2009). In a number of studies using microscopic models, model parameters describing driving behaviour (such as headway, acceleration, reaction time) have been adjusted for the case of emergency evacuation (e.g., Tu et al 2010).…”
Section: Past and Current Evacuation Traffic Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evacuation studies using the en-route route choice model are scarce. One possible example is the study by Mitchell and Radwan (2006) using INTEGRATION (Rakha and van Aerde 2004) to study the impact of evacuation staging on network clearance time. However, it should be mentioned that INTEGRATION provides both pretrip and en-route route choice models and it is not fully clear which route choice model alternative was used in this study.…”
Section: En-route Route Choice Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have focused on different aspects of evacuation planning, such as demand modeling (Mei 2002;Wilmot 2004;Fu 2007), departure scheduling (Malone 2001;Mitchell 2006;Sbyati 2006;Chien 2007;Chen 2008), route choice (Cova 2003;Afshar 2008;Chiu 2008;Yazici 2010;Zheng 2010;Xie 2011;), contra-flow operation (Theodoulou 2004;Wolshon 2005;Tuydes 2006;Xie 2010) and relief operation (Haghani 1996;Barbarosoglu 2004;Ozbay 2007;Xie 2009). Most of these are specific to the control and management of passenger car flows.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several demand time profiles are defined and simulated through mesoscopic [15] or microscopic simulators [16] and compared with the simultaneous departures scenario. Evacuation demand scheduling is also treated through a pseudo-dynamic approach [2].…”
Section: Literature Review Of Dta Models In Emergency Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%