2016
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2015.2477998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heuristic Algorithm for Proportional Fair Scheduling in D2D-Cellular Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 3, it can be seen that the performance of the random algorithm (RA) is the worst, and the performance of the exhaustive algorithm (EA) is the best. From Figures 3 and 4, compared with the genetic Input: PAR min , PAR max , HMCR min , HMS, g n , MAXI, d, U min , U max , L, α Output: we use C(U x ), P average or EE as the results (1) Step 1: initialization and coding (2) Step 2: generate new solutions and update the harmony memory bank (3) While g n <� MAXI (4) For j � 1 : K (5) For i � 1 : M (6) If rand < HMCR then (7) index1 � roultte(fitness function) (8) index2 � roultte(fitness function) (9) If index1 < index2 (10) index � index2 (11) Else (12) index � index1 (13) End (14) If rand < PAR (15) If rand < d (16) Newharmony(i) � HM(index, i) + bw (17) Else (18) Newharmony (i) � HM(index, i) − bw (19) End (20) Else (21) Newharmony (i) � HM(index, i); 6 Mobile Information Systems algorithm (GA) which has good performance in the eld of D2D resource allocation, the improved harmony search algorithm (IHSA) has superior global search performance by dynamically adjusting algorithm parameters. erefore, the improved harmony search algorithm proposed in this paper is closer to the result of the exhaustive algorithm.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Figure 3, it can be seen that the performance of the random algorithm (RA) is the worst, and the performance of the exhaustive algorithm (EA) is the best. From Figures 3 and 4, compared with the genetic Input: PAR min , PAR max , HMCR min , HMS, g n , MAXI, d, U min , U max , L, α Output: we use C(U x ), P average or EE as the results (1) Step 1: initialization and coding (2) Step 2: generate new solutions and update the harmony memory bank (3) While g n <� MAXI (4) For j � 1 : K (5) For i � 1 : M (6) If rand < HMCR then (7) index1 � roultte(fitness function) (8) index2 � roultte(fitness function) (9) If index1 < index2 (10) index � index2 (11) Else (12) index � index1 (13) End (14) If rand < PAR (15) If rand < d (16) Newharmony(i) � HM(index, i) + bw (17) Else (18) Newharmony (i) � HM(index, i) − bw (19) End (20) Else (21) Newharmony (i) � HM(index, i); 6 Mobile Information Systems algorithm (GA) which has good performance in the eld of D2D resource allocation, the improved harmony search algorithm (IHSA) has superior global search performance by dynamically adjusting algorithm parameters. erefore, the improved harmony search algorithm proposed in this paper is closer to the result of the exhaustive algorithm.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the computational complexity of the learning framework, two kinds of resource allocation algorithms based on matching theory were proposed for different scenarios. In [10], a low-complexity heuristic algorithm had also been proposed to realize the high logarithmic sum of the average user data rates. In [11], a new adaptive subcarrier allocation scheme was designed and a novel power allocation scheme was proposed, which can provide an optimal solution with low computation complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user status mainly considers the number of active users, D2D clusters, and the D2D users. The comparison of resource reuse includes no-reuse scheme, random scheme [29], heuristic algorithm [30], and the Hungarian algorithm proposed in this paper. The key parameters of the simulation are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the PF scheduling is used to achieve the system fairness. As proven in [12], the PF scheduling scheme in D2D underlay communications can be expressed as…”
Section: B Pf Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few works on how PF scheduling scheme is applied in D2D underlay communications. Authors in [12] transform the PF scheduling into an assignment problem form by applying Maclaurin series expansion without considering the mutual interferences. However, the transmission powers of all users are allocated the same value and authors do not consider the QoS requirements of all links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%