2013
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat area and climate stability determine geographical variation in plant species range sizes

Abstract: Despite being a fundamental aspect of biodiversity, little is known about what controls species range sizes. This is especially the case for hyperdiverse organisms such as plants. We use the largest botanical data set assembled to date to quantify geographical variation in range size for ∼ 85 000 plant species across the New World. We assess prominent hypothesised range-size controls, finding that plant range sizes are codetermined by habitat area and long- and short-term climate stability. Strong short- and l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
149
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
149
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the phenotypic variation in woody plants was usually correlated with latitude, due to the temperature gradient (Jan & Jon 2010, Naia et al 2013). In this study, 9 of 20 phenotypic traits in T. sinense had a significant negative correlation with longitude, and 10 traits had a positive correlation with elevation, only 3 indexes presented association with latitude, which indicating that the phenotypic variation in T. sinense showed cline along longitude and elevation, and latitude had few influence on phenotypic variation in T. sinense, different from the results in most woody plants, but in accordance with the result from Pyracantha crenulata and Cotinus szechuanensis (Pinyopusarerk & Williams 2005, Naia et al 2013. As a rule, relative humidity would increase and annual sunshine hours would decrease with the increase of longitude, resulting in smaller size of leaf and seed in T. sinense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the phenotypic variation in woody plants was usually correlated with latitude, due to the temperature gradient (Jan & Jon 2010, Naia et al 2013). In this study, 9 of 20 phenotypic traits in T. sinense had a significant negative correlation with longitude, and 10 traits had a positive correlation with elevation, only 3 indexes presented association with latitude, which indicating that the phenotypic variation in T. sinense showed cline along longitude and elevation, and latitude had few influence on phenotypic variation in T. sinense, different from the results in most woody plants, but in accordance with the result from Pyracantha crenulata and Cotinus szechuanensis (Pinyopusarerk & Williams 2005, Naia et al 2013. As a rule, relative humidity would increase and annual sunshine hours would decrease with the increase of longitude, resulting in smaller size of leaf and seed in T. sinense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the unscaled analysis, we expected that all communities would have nonzero climate mismatch relative to present-day climate, indicating disequilibrium between vegetation composition and contemporary climate. Spatially, we also expected that the climate mismatch would correlate negatively with absolute latitude (i.e., more mixing of species pools at the interface of North and South America) and the magnitude of climate change since the LGM (i.e., more change is harder to track), and that climate volume would correlate positively with species' mean range size (i.e., more generalists; see Morueta-Holme et al 2013).…”
Section: Illustrating the Framework With New World Tree Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shifts were calculated using the sources listed in Materials and methods: Climate data. Range size for species in each local community were calculated as convex hulls and obtained from the BIEN database (Morueta-Holme et al 2013). …”
Section: Spatial Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological functions and processes are dependent on larger spatial scales than a single habitat patch (Gustafson 1998, Steffan-Dewenter et al 2002. Biodiversity is often positively correlated with the amount of available habitat (Fahrig 2003), but the effect of land-use changes on biodiversity depends on the landscape context (MacDonald et al 2000) and on the spatial scale that has been analyzed (McGlinn and Hurlbert 2012, Dumbrell et al 2008, Zimmermann et al 2010, Morueta-Holme et al 2013. Furthermore, ecological communities are structured under processes that act on the landscape, in which both regional and local scales are important factors (Harrison and Cornell 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%