1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(95)80286-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of GaxIn1−xAs/InP thin layer structures by chemical beam epitaxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the atomic configuration of the four bonds of the intermediate group III layer. This is not the same as was proposed previously, in [14], but this difference will be discussed later.…”
Section: Structure Analysis By Hr-xrdsupporting
confidence: 42%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…the atomic configuration of the four bonds of the intermediate group III layer. This is not the same as was proposed previously, in [14], but this difference will be discussed later.…”
Section: Structure Analysis By Hr-xrdsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…There is, of course, some amount of arbitrariness in the choice of the composition of the well and the two interfaces. Choosing as bottom interface one monolayer of InAs and as top interface one monolayer of lattice-matched quaternary material, as done in [14], supplies the same value of x in the quantum well as the arrangement of one monolayer of InAs 0.5 P 0.5 at both interfaces does in the present paper. But to clearly resolve differences on this level, samples are required in which particularly the higher (>2) order satellite intensity distributions can be analysed from HR-XRD spectra combined with simulations using dynamical diffraction theory.…”
Section: Final Remarks/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each MQW period consisted of a nominally lattice-matched GaInAs layer (x Ga ϭ0.468) and an InP layer with different thickness separated by interfacial layers on both sides of the GaInAs layers due to the switching sequence during CBE growth. 13,14 The growth interruption sequence ͑GIS͒ between the respective GaInAs and InP layers was chosen in the following way: After growth of InP the surface was smoothened under cracked PH 3 for a time t 1 . Then the InP surface was exposed to cracked AsH 3 for a time t 2 ϭ1 s prior to the growth of GaInAs, during which substitution of phosphorus by arsenic takes place.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%