2010
DOI: 10.1177/0964663909346200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governing Permanence: Trans Subjects, Time, and the Gender Recognition Act

Abstract: The UK Gender Recognition Act 2004 contains a provision requiring that transgender applicants intend to remain in their acquired gender ‘until death’. While apparently a straightforward administrative demand within a piece of archetypal New Labour legislation, this article argues that the requirement is unnecessary on the legislation’s own terms. Focusing instead on the temporal work that the provision performs in relation to gender recognition, I situate it in relation to New Labour’s ‘social cohesion’ rhetor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender transition can refer to social transition, physical transformation, or both. Many transgender (hereafter: trans) people do not seek medicalized assistance for transition, which can involve delays other than those created by medicine, such as waits involved in legal name and gender marker changes (Baril, 2016; Currah, 2014; Currah and Moore, 2009; Grabham, 2010; Spade, 2008). 2 And irrespective of any institutional entanglements, the subjective experience of transition itself may involve waiting (Baril, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction: Turning Down Without Turning Offmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gender transition can refer to social transition, physical transformation, or both. Many transgender (hereafter: trans) people do not seek medicalized assistance for transition, which can involve delays other than those created by medicine, such as waits involved in legal name and gender marker changes (Baril, 2016; Currah, 2014; Currah and Moore, 2009; Grabham, 2010; Spade, 2008). 2 And irrespective of any institutional entanglements, the subjective experience of transition itself may involve waiting (Baril, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction: Turning Down Without Turning Offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2. Transgender subjects are often made to wait for gender recognition while the authenticity and stability of their identities are measured (see Grabham, 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 As techniques of governance, Grabham writes, "temporal constructs … create particular types of embodied legal subject, with particular histories, trajectories and futures." 33 Though Grabham does not examine security temporalities specifically, the question of how juridical decisions and documents create the legal subject of "the proscribed organisation"-with its particular histories and projected futures-is pertinent. Rather than a coherent rationality of proscription, what is emerging can be understood as an "assembly of legal temporalities through a range of disjunctive moves and apparently unlikely actors."…”
Section: Security Temporalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent High Court case, a trans woman known as JK challenged the legal requirement that she be recorded as ‘father’ on her children’s birth certificates. Despite self-identifying and living her life as a woman, in the absence of a gender recognition certificate – which takes some time to acquire (see further Grabham, 2010 ) – JK was legally regarded as male, as per her original birth certificate { JK v Register General for England and Wales [2015] EWHC 990 (Admin)}. 7 To complicate matters further, JK’s male name was recorded on her first child’s birth certificate, while her female name appeared on her second child’s.…”
Section: Challenging Times For Birth Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%