2019
DOI: 10.3390/nano9071027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GFET Asymmetric Transfer Response Analysis through Access Region Resistances

Abstract: Graphene-based devices are planned to augment the functionality of Si and III-V based technology in radio-frequency (RF) electronics. The expectations in designing graphene field-effect transistors (GFETs) with enhanced RF performance have attracted significant experimental efforts, mainly concentrated on achieving high mobility samples. However, little attention has been paid, so far, to the role of the access regions in these devices. Here, we analyse in detail, via numerical simulations, how the GFET transf… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different slope of the two branches corresponds to the hole mobility (~--V s 150 cm 2 1 1 ) higher than the electron one (~--V s 100 cm 2 1 1 ), while the slight shift of the Dirac point to positive V gs indicates a low p-type carrier concentration due to adsorbates and process residues such as PMMA, not removed by the 1 mbar vacuum and 400 K annealing [59,84]. The holeelectron asymmetry is due to both unbalanced carrier injection from metal contacts and graphene interaction with the SiO 2 dielectric [84][85][86][87][88][89]. The interaction with SiO 2 is also the main cause of the hysteresis which appears when the gate voltage is swept back and forth [88][89][90].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The different slope of the two branches corresponds to the hole mobility (~--V s 150 cm 2 1 1 ) higher than the electron one (~--V s 100 cm 2 1 1 ), while the slight shift of the Dirac point to positive V gs indicates a low p-type carrier concentration due to adsorbates and process residues such as PMMA, not removed by the 1 mbar vacuum and 400 K annealing [59,84]. The holeelectron asymmetry is due to both unbalanced carrier injection from metal contacts and graphene interaction with the SiO 2 dielectric [84][85][86][87][88][89]. The interaction with SiO 2 is also the main cause of the hysteresis which appears when the gate voltage is swept back and forth [88][89][90].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 1a shows the equivalent resistive networks of both three-and four-terminal GFETs with the intrinsic graphene channel resistance (Rch) and the extrinsic drain (Rc,d) and source (Rc,s) resistances. These include the drain and source metal-graphene contact resistances, respectively, which are currently crucial and undesirable elements impacting the RF performance of GFETs [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. For the sake of simplicity, bias-independent contact resistances have been considered in the device modeling approach of this work.…”
Section: Dirac Point Shift (Dps): Theory Vs Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, at this bias point the resistance associated with the access regions (as computed from the self-consistent simulations), have comparable values to R c , reaching R s,acc = 3.3 kΩ • µm and R d,acc = 3.1 kΩ • µm at the source and drain ends, respectively and being rather bias dependent. This point highlights the strong impact that these gate-underlapped areas can produce on the RF performance of the device [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%