2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2008.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getter free vacuum packaging for MEMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have independently modelled this effect and found stark, but advantageous, differences from the original study by Gan et al 180 . We suspect that an error was made in tabulating their results, which also clarifies their unexplained lifetime increase for 100 mbar cavities.…”
Section: Direct Bondingmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have independently modelled this effect and found stark, but advantageous, differences from the original study by Gan et al 180 . We suspect that an error was made in tabulating their results, which also clarifies their unexplained lifetime increase for 100 mbar cavities.…”
Section: Direct Bondingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This can be achieved practically by introducing a buffer cavity, or moat, within the seam such that the slow leakage into the moat results in an even slower leakage into the main vacuum cavity 180 . This can be modeled by the following formulae and solved numerically:…”
Section: Direct Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outgassing from the internal material layers of a MEMS device can contribute significantly to the degradation of vacuum within a cavity (Gan et al 2008). Devices that require a vacuum for optimum operation are often sealed using the most hermetic packaging techniques requiring high temperatures which can influence outgassing into the cavity.…”
Section: Outgassingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results can also be used to find a suitable getter should it not be possible to change materials and processes. RGA is however destructive and expensive and getters are not always a suitable answer to outgassing issues (Gan et al 2008).…”
Section: Outgassingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q factor measurements are limited by complicated circuits and not sufficient sensitivity at the level of low pressures [8,9], thus, it cannot precisely measure small pressure change inside a sealed micro-cavity [10]. Our group reported on-line monitoring method using embedded resonator [11,12]. However, for these sensors, their fabrications are complicated and expensive, and they are proved to have low pressure sensitivity under 10 Pa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%