2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the Bayesian methods differ in a priori assumptions about marker effects, their predictive ability was very similar and small differences were detected for any of the traits (Figure 2). The similarity between the different models was reported by other authors (Brunes et al, 2020;Lopes et al, 2021;Resende et al, 2012), and could be attributed to the polygenic nature of the evaluated traits, where a large number of markers explain the genetic additive variance. The exception was observed for WBSF, where the predictive ability was higher using the Bayes B model (0.47), and lower using the Bayes Cπ model (0.39).…”
Section: Predictive Abilitysupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the Bayesian methods differ in a priori assumptions about marker effects, their predictive ability was very similar and small differences were detected for any of the traits (Figure 2). The similarity between the different models was reported by other authors (Brunes et al, 2020;Lopes et al, 2021;Resende et al, 2012), and could be attributed to the polygenic nature of the evaluated traits, where a large number of markers explain the genetic additive variance. The exception was observed for WBSF, where the predictive ability was higher using the Bayes B model (0.47), and lower using the Bayes Cπ model (0.39).…”
Section: Predictive Abilitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Single-trait analyses were performed using the restricted maximum likelihood method with the REMLF90 software (Misztal et al, 2019). In routine Nellore cattle genomic evaluations, the WBSF is evaluated in a single trait model (Lobo et al, 2021), since the genetic correlation with other traits such as REA and BF is low (Lopes et al, 2021). The multiple-trait model was tested in previous study (Lopes et al, 2021), and was observed that there was not much gain in prediction accuracy in the genomic analyses performed using the multi-trait, over the single-trait, approach for REA and WBSF.…”
Section: Estimation Of Genetic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-established that DNA-based inheritance enables the transmission of selected phenotypes across generations either without changes in the DNA sequence through epigenetic inheritance [31] or through functional mutations involving changes in only one base pair (single nucleotide polymorphisms-SNP). Through next-generation sequencing, SNP are valuable for detecting genetic variability and genomic prediction in sheep breeding programs [32], developing breed-specific DNA markers for breed identification [33,34], animal productivity [35], parentage assignment [36,37], forensics [38], and prediction of meat quality traits [39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction accuracy for REA with the default ssGBLUP was 41% higher than that with the BLUP model. Lopes et al (2021) compared the predictive ability for REA in Nelore cattle using different models and reported a higher (0.42) predictive ability using the ssGBLUP. Silva et al (2021), comparing the genomic prediction accuracy for REA in Nelore cattle using different prediction models, also obtained higher predictive ability for the ssGBLUP (0.62) than the BLUP model (0.24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%