Gagasan Pemberian Legal Standing Bagi Warga Negara Asing dalam Constitutional Review

Yusa, I Gede; Sudibya, Komang Pradnyana; Aryani, Nyoman Mas; Hermanto, Bagus

doi:10.31078/jk1544

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Referring to the state administrative dispute, the pattern for determining legal standing is the party directly harmed by a decision. 41 In the case of appointing a non-definitive regional head, it is not clear who is the party that suffers a direct loss. In this context, the question arises as to who has the right to file a lawsuit against a decision by the President or Minister over a decision to appoint a non-definitive regional head.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State

Siboy

Al-Fatih

Triasari

et al. 2023

BESTUUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<div><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left"><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><p class="AbstractText">The process of resolving administrative violations in the appointment of non-definitive regional heads that have not been regulated can threaten democratic values. Likewise, there has not been a judicial institution that has been given special authority to try it. This study aims to provide a regulatory model or settlement of administrative violations in the appointment of non-definitive regional heads in the welfare state. This study is a normative legal research that uses legal theory to settle administrative violations, legal protection, the welfare state, and Pancasila democracy. The study results show that the judicial mechanism for appointing non-definitive regional heads has a specificity that cannot be resolved through general State Administrative dispute resolution. In the USA, election disputes were resolved through the courts, whereas, in Australia, the Electoral Management Bodies determine the mayoral elections dispute. A design that can be chosen for the judicial process for appointing a non-definitive regional head is proposed, namely by granting authority to <em>Bawaslu</em> to resolve administrative violations through the Special Court mechanism. The granting of judicial authority can fulfill the basic principles of fast, open, and constitutional non-definitive regional head appointment dispute resolution.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div>

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State

Siboy

Al-Fatih

Triasari

et al. 2023

BESTUUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An adage d'interet point d'action justifies that a charge can be filed for legal interest (Yusa, Sudibya, Aryani, & Hermanto, 2018). However, not everyone can file a claim to the Constitutional Court.…”

Section: Legal Standing Of the Applicantmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Urgency of the Constitutional Question by the Constitutional Court and Its Relevance to the Indonesian Democracy Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Madjid

Asmorojati

2023

JPHK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Constitutional Court’s authority to conduct the judicial review contains deficiencies implied upon the less maximum efforts to actualize constitutional democracy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, the constitutional question is crucial in responding to the issue; it influences the increase of the Indonesian democracy index during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study aimed to examine and analyze the urgency of constitutional questions by the Indonesian Constitutional Court in actualizing constitutional democracy with a particular design if it is to be regulated in the Constitution and the laws of the Constitutional Court. The research belongs to normative juridical with library research method. The results showed the urgency of the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s authority to impose constitutional questions. (1) It is to increase the Indonesian democracy index during the COVID-19 pandemic (2) It is to protect the citizens’ Constitutional Rights; (3) It is to increase the citizens’ constitutional awareness; (4) It is to connect the judges’ interpretation; (5) It is to actualize progressive and responsive substantive justice. Besides, the research compared the authorities of the constitutional courts applied by countries such as Austria, Germany, and Russia, where the Constitutional Courts in several countries have constitutional question authority. A recommendation of constitutional question arrangement within the Indonesian constitutional system accompanied this research.

show abstract

“…26 Legal standing adalah keadaan di mana seseorang atau suatu pihak ditentukan memenuhi syarat dan oleh karena itu mempunyai hak untuk mengajukan permohonan penyelesaian perselisihan atau sengketa atau perkara di depan Mahkamah Konstitusi. 27 Legal standing merupakan syarat awal yang harus dipenuhi oleh para pemohon untuk Sebagai penafsir akhir dari konstitusi (the final interpreteur of the constitution), di mana ketika terdapat pasal-pasal yang ambigu, tidak jelas maupun multi tafsir maka dapat dimintakan penafsiran kepada Mahkamah Konstitusi. Meskipun semua orang boleh-boleh saja menafsirkan konstitusi tetapi tafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi lah yang menjadi tafsir satu-satunya (the sole interpreteur of the constitution) sehingga setelah adanya tafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi, maka semua khalayak patuh dan mengikuti tafsiran tersebut.…”

unclassified

Legal Standing Pemohon Terkait Pengajuan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi

2024

JMH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to determine the meaning of the qualifications of legal standing of the applicant in the judicial review of the Law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The petition argued by the applicant must fulfill the elements related to the legal standing of the applicant in the Judicial Review in the Constitutional Court so that it can prove that the applicable law has caused a loss of constitutional rights. The research method uses normative legal research. Testing the constitutionality of the norms of the Law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the applicants must pay careful attention to the qualifications of legal standing against the enactment of a law that is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of theRepublic of Indonesia, the applicants must also pay attention to the aspects of the constitutionality of the norms and the implementation of the norms of a law. The Constitutional Court has the authority to examine the constitutionality of the norms of a law. It does not examine the implementation of a legal norm, which is the authority of the Supreme Court.

show abstract

Gagasan Pemberian Legal Standing Bagi Warga Negara Asing dalam Constitutional Review

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State

Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State

The Urgency of the Constitutional Question by the Constitutional Court and Its Relevance to the Indonesian Democracy Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Legal Standing Pemohon Terkait Pengajuan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About