Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State

Siboy, Ahmad; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Triasari, Devi; Tegnan, Hilaire

doi:10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.71055

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Remaining in the position after a five-year office term will require the official to rejoin candidacy in the next election. This normative provision in the constitution as above sets the rule implying that fulfilling the position of a regional head must only involve either direct or indirect election (Siboy et al, 2023). On the contrary, this post-filling process may also consider lineage and other bases.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Islamic Law-based design of regional head post-filling

Siboy,

Permadi,

Karim

et al. 2024

LJIH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to elaborate on the standing of Islamic law regarding regional head post-filling and how this post-filling is designed to conform with the principle of Islamic law. This research employed mixed methods and statutory, conceptual, case, and normative-theological approaches. The research results reveal that Islam holds the principles that can be adopted into the constructions of the national law in the matter of regional head post-filling. In the time to come, this post-filling should conform to the principle of al muhafadhotu ala qodimis sholih wal akhdzu bil jadidil ashlah, in which this post-filling should refer to the applicable model coupled with the development of this model with an asymmetric post-filling system. With this approach, areas with direct regional head elections will face reduction. Consequently, the areas not eligible to establish direct elections should consider another election model.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Islamic Law-based design of regional head post-filling

Siboy,

Permadi,

Karim

et al. 2024

LJIH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Social justice related to utilizing marine resources should be distributed equally among communities, especially coastal communities (traditional and local) that are less fortunate economically. 70 Environmental law places a significant emphasis on social justice. In the ecological era, environmental justice has become the archetype of justice, emphasizing the need for equitable distribution of resources and preservation of vulnerable groups.…”

Section: The Role Of Social Justice In Coastal Protection Policiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Social Justice Legitimacy to Protect Coastal Residents

Syaprillah,

Zein,

H.Malloy

2023

JHCLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aimed to establish the legitimacy of protecting coastal residents from a social justice perspective. This was normative legal research conducted following cases, statutes, facts, and comparisons. The results of this study show how important it is to prioritize social equity for coastal protection. As natural calamities become more frequent, property protection becomes more difficult. Countries endowed with substantial financial and human resources can effectively tackle the challenges associated with climate change mitigation through the development and establishment of state-of-the-art scientific and technological infrastructure. In multicultural social justice, all individuals are valued. Priorities for environmental and social justice are prevalent in developing nations afflicted by coastal ecological degradation and widening income gaps. Developed nations like Germany have implemented and enforced coastal protection policies to uphold environmental justice principles. Second, the community-led governance initiatives generated genuine participation through mutual aid. Environmental law advances the cause of social justice. Environmental justice, which emphasizes the distribution of resources and the preservation of vulnerable groups, has emerged as the essence of justice in the ecological age.

show abstract

“…The administrative justice process through the State Administrative Court cannot be pursued by those seeking justice since a lawsuit over the Judgment to Appoint an Acting Regional Head can only be carried out by the appointed Acting Regional Head. Meanwhile, dominantly people do not have legal standing given that there is no direct and concrete loss suffered by the people (Siboy, Al-Fatih, Triasari, & Tegnan, 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constitutionality of Appointment of Acting Regional Heads in Constitutional Court Judgment

Siboy,

Muhammad Nur

2023

jurisprudence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the study: This research aimed to describe the ratio decindi of the Constitutional Court's judgment in terms of judicial review regarding the appointment of acting regional heads and its implications on the meaning of sovereignty in its implementation. Methodology: This research is normative legal research because it is based on the Constitutional Court Judgment Number 67/PUU-XIX/2021. The approaches used are the statutory regulations approach, the judge's decisoon approach, the conceptual approach, the case approach, and the philosophical approach. Results: The Constitutional Court stated that the appointment of acting regional heads as a result of the postponement of the Pilkada was a legal policy chosen by the legislators (People's Representative Council and President) which qualified as a constitutional legal alternative considering that the delay of the Pilkada had no impact on reducing the right to vote and the right to be candidate. Applications of this study: This research can be used to develop courses in general election law and regional head elections, especially in understanding how the Constitutional Court considers a decision. Apart from that, this research can also be used as a consideration in efforts to change the law regarding regional elections or can also be used as additional evidence if another judicial review of the regulations regarding the postponement of regional elections. Novelty/ Orginalty of this study: There has been no previous research that specifically analyzes the Constitutional Court's judgment regarding the appointment of acting regional heads in terms of the legitimacy of the meaning of popular sovereignty and its implications for the practice of appointing acting regional heads. The legitimacy of the appointment of acting regional heads in the Constitutional Court’s judgment is an interpretation that has degrade the challenge of the meaning or position of regional heads, in which the status has experienced shifting in meaning from a political position to a career position. As a result, the people's right to determine their own regional heads is taken over by the central government. The shift from the people's right to choose to the right of the President and Ministers to appoint regional heads is a shift that leads to a shift in sovereignty, namely, from the sovereignty of the people to the sovereignty of the ruler. Keywords: Regional head, Ratio decidendi, Popular sovereignty. ABSTRAK Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan ratio decindi putusan MK dalam hal uji materi tentang penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah serta implikasinya terhadap makna kedaulatan rakyat dalam implementasi penunjukkan kepala daerah. Metodologi: Penelitian ini termasuk dalam jenis penelitian yuridis normatif karena berpijak pada putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 67/PUU-XIX/2021. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan putusan hakim, pendekatan konsep, pendakatan kasus dan pendekatan filosofis. Temuan: Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan bahwa penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah sebagai akibat dari penundaan penyelenggaraan Pilkada merupakan politik hukum yang dipilih pembentuk undang-undang (DPR dan Presiden) yang terkualifikasi sebagai pilihan hukum yang konstitusional mengingat penundaan Pilkada tersebut tidak berdampak terhadap pengurangan hak untuk dipilih (right to vote) dan hak untuk memilih (right tobe candidate). Kegunaan: Penelitian ini dapat dimanfaatkan bagi pengembangan mata kuliah hukum pemilihan umum dan pemilihan kepala daerah khususnya hal mengetahui bagaimana MK membuat pertimbangan dalam suatu putusan. Disamping itu, penelitian ini juga dapat dijadikan pertimbangan dalam upaya perubahan undang-undang tentang Pilkada atau dapat pula dijadikan sebagai tambahan dalil apabila akan dilakukan uji materi lagi terhadap aturan tentang penundaan Pilkada. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Belum terdapat penelitian terdahulu yang menganalisis secara khusus putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah dari sisi legitimasi makna kedaulatan rakyat dan implikasinya dalam praktek penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah. Legitimasi penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah dalam putusan Mahkamah konstitusi merupakan tafsir yang telah mereduksi tantang makna atau kedudukan kepala daerah dimana kedudukan kepala daerah mengalami pergeseran makna dari jabatan politis menjadi jabatan karir. Akibatnya, hak rakyat untuk menentukan sendiri kepala daerahnya diambil alih oleh pemerintah pusat. Pergeseran hak untuk memilih dari rakyat secara langsung menjadi hak Presiden dan Menteri dalam hal penunjukkan kepala daerah merupakan pergeseran yang menyebabkan terjadinya peralihan kedaulatan. Yakni, dari kedaulatan rakyat menjadi kedaulatan penguasa. Keywords: Penjabat kepala daerah, ratio decidendi, Kedaulatan Rakyat.

show abstract

Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State

Cited by 3 publications

References 34 publications

The Islamic Law-based design of regional head post-filling

The Islamic Law-based design of regional head post-filling

A Social Justice Legitimacy to Protect Coastal Residents

Constitutionality of Appointment of Acting Regional Heads in Constitutional Court Judgment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About