2015
DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2015.1085024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Smart Borders to Perimeter Security: The Expansion of Digital Surveillance at the Canadian Borders

Abstract: Terrorists are finding new ways of attacking developing countries like Kenya using current technology. Security forces and guards are exposed to high risk of attack due to lack of modern facilities to monitor international borders and buildings. Due to this challenge, a system was proposed that would be used to monitor these places remotely. This system was able to interact with other security gadgets like drones to effectively survey international borders and buildings, send real-time alerts, and stream video… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus on the collection and processing of digital data by state and non-state actors has given rise to concerns about surveillance or dataveillance of mobile populations in borderzones (see e.g. Broeders and Dijstelbloem 2015;Topak et al 2015;Scheel, Ruppert, and Ustek-Spilda 2019) and migrant profiling through 'non-representational categories rather than actual real-life social groups' (Leese 2014, 504). Surplus data refers to data that is not immediately used by states for border governance, but that remains 'invisible' while indispensable to platform capitalism.…”
Section: Experimental Users Surplus Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on the collection and processing of digital data by state and non-state actors has given rise to concerns about surveillance or dataveillance of mobile populations in borderzones (see e.g. Broeders and Dijstelbloem 2015;Topak et al 2015;Scheel, Ruppert, and Ustek-Spilda 2019) and migrant profiling through 'non-representational categories rather than actual real-life social groups' (Leese 2014, 504). Surplus data refers to data that is not immediately used by states for border governance, but that remains 'invisible' while indispensable to platform capitalism.…”
Section: Experimental Users Surplus Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here studies focus centrally on theorizing the connections between race, white supremacy, and settler colonialism (Bonds & Inwood, ; Clarno, ; Eastwood, ; Inwood & Bonds, ; Mott, , ; Tatour, ). In addition to linking the growth of borderings in settler contexts with biopolitical imperatives (Dodds, ; Topak, Bracken‐Roche, Saulnier, & Lyon, ), studies link the rise of new border regimes and “internal colonialisms” in nonsettler contexts with settler logics (Giglioli, ).…”
Section: Population Management/biopoliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This collection builds on previous work, which examines the adoption of dual-use technologies for civil applications within the EU ) and the adoption of security technologies in the domestic context in the United States and Canada (such as Akhter 2017;Bracken-Roche 2016;Topak et al 2015;Wall and Monahan 2011). Through an in-depth study of specific technologies within the EU context, each chapter engages with the technical, social, political and normative controversies that emerge around the technologies and their governance within the EU.…”
Section: Developing Future Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%