Political geographical perspectives on settler colonialism

Abstract

Given the centrality of land, territory, and sovereignty to settler colonial formations, it is unsurprising that geographers and other scholars working on such topics are increasingly finding settler colonial studies fruitful in their research agendas. However, work on settler polities in political geography has historically been marked by the present absence of this framework, which has been consequential in terms of circumscribing the kinds of political analysis that geographers can offer. It also limits the nature, depth, and scope of radical critique of violent domination by skirting certain questions about the core drivers of dispossession and responsibility for them. This article examines political geographical engagement (or lack thereof) across each of four themes: population management/governance, territory/sovereignty, consciousness, and narrative, paying particular attention to works which challenge the present absence of settler colonial theory in political geography. We argue that analyzing settler colonial formations as such is essential to conceptualizing their workings and linkages or disjunctures with other forms of empire. Yet this focus also has broader political stakes related to geography's complicity with racialized state power, violence, and empire, as well as and efforts to decolonize the discipline.

Controlling the narrative: Critiquing the geopolitical narratives of US environmental impact assessments and exclusion of Indigenous communities

“…The focus of this article is on two often separate—but occasionally related—geopolitical topics: Indigenous geopolitics and environmental geopolitics. The existing literature on Indigenous geopolitics often centers on issues of territory, identity, and sovereignty, particularly of Indigenous communities faced with the challenges of erasure by settler colonial societies (Gibson, 2013; Medby, 2021; Velednitsky et al, 2020). On the contrary, environmental geopolitics literature is widespread as environmental features are increasingly entangled in geopolitical issues including concerns over climate change, conservation, resource supply chains, and much more (Dalby, 2014; Gray et al, 2020; Le Billon and Shykora, 2020; O’Lear and Dalby, 2015).…”

Changing geographies of the state: themes, challenges and futures

“…First, Indigenous geographies need to be foregrounded in future scholarship on the state. As Velednitsky et al (2020) have recently noted, the most significant 'present absence' in political geography today is a serious engagement with settler colonial theory. Until now, there have only been modest efforts to integrate into mainstream discussions of state theory the vast and crucial research in Indigenous studies scholarship on sovereignty, state power, settler colonialism and modes of relating to the land within and beyond the territorial state (e.g.…”

Geographies of capital punishment: New directions and interventions

“…There are several related areas in which geographers work where a focus on the racist political geographies of capital punishment fits. First, is recent work on the connections between settler colonial states and white supremacy (Bonds & Inwood, 2016; Inwood, 2018; Velednitsky, Hughes, & Machold, 2020). This work suggests that settler colonialism is an ongoing “project of empire enabled by white supremacy” that “focuses on the permanent occupation of a territory and removal of indigenous peoples” (Bonds & Inwood, 2016, p. 716).…”