2007
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8150035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fraud and Peace: Investigative Interviewing and Fraud Investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique is reminiscent of the enhanced cognitive interview widely in use in police settings when interviewing witnesses Shawyer and Walsh, 2007). It is found in a range of contexts that this technique elicits more correct information from witness than a standard interview procedure (Köhnken et al, 1999).…”
Section: Conversation Management and The Detection Of Dishonest Claimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is reminiscent of the enhanced cognitive interview widely in use in police settings when interviewing witnesses Shawyer and Walsh, 2007). It is found in a range of contexts that this technique elicits more correct information from witness than a standard interview procedure (Köhnken et al, 1999).…”
Section: Conversation Management and The Detection Of Dishonest Claimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating the effectiveness of communication is problematic, as there has been no research into corporate investigator communication. Research into the investigative interviewing techniques may assist in defining effective communication; however, even in this growing body of research, the focus outside of traditional policing is limited to a few notable exceptions, specifically, addressing regulatory investigators for the Department of Works and Pensions in the UK (Shawyer and Walsh, 2007). Typically, the studies indicate that the regulatory investigators have poor interviewing skills and have difficulty in consistently using the basic elements of investigative interviewing in a non-judgemental framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UK FLM exercises are undertaken regularly by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (responsible for paying social security), HM Revenue and Customs (responsible for collecting taxes), and the National Health Service (NHS) (the public provider of healthcare in the UK). The DWP invests a great deal of time in measuring fraud losses and more generally in investigation and prevention (DWP, 2011 andShawyer andWalsh, 2007). It conducts FLM exercises regularly across a range of benefits it issues, which enables it to estimate a global figure of fraud losses, which is largely the result of FLM, although the currency for some types of expenditure does vary.…”
Section: Fraud Loss Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%