2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2008.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral scent analysis in Hieracium subgenus Pilosella and its taxonomical implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Component identification was carried out using NIST 2008 mass spectral database and confirmed by the comparison of their linear retention index ( LRI ) with published data [ 15 ]. Identification of individual components could be confirmed by the comparison of both mass spectrum and GC retention data with those of authentic standards [ 32 ]. A series of n-alkane standards (C6-C19) (Accu Standard, New Haven, CT, USA) were analyzed under the same conditions to obtain LRI values for the volatile compounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Component identification was carried out using NIST 2008 mass spectral database and confirmed by the comparison of their linear retention index ( LRI ) with published data [ 15 ]. Identification of individual components could be confirmed by the comparison of both mass spectrum and GC retention data with those of authentic standards [ 32 ]. A series of n-alkane standards (C6-C19) (Accu Standard, New Haven, CT, USA) were analyzed under the same conditions to obtain LRI values for the volatile compounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important constraint on pollinator‐mediated selection of scent compounds is phylogenetic inertia. Assessing the importance of plant phylogeny in affecting floral scent composition comes mainly from studies that have considered the utility of scent data for taxonomic or phylogenetic reconstruction (i.e., Barkman et al, 1997; Barkman, 2001; Levin, et al, 2003; Feulner et al, 2009) rather than in an ecological context as a constraint on pollinator‐mediated selection per se (see Peakall et al, 2010). The consensus from these studies is that scent data can provide some phylogenetic signal, but most scent compounds are homoplasious.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18. Primary metabolites such as fatty acids, as well as monoterpenes detected by GC-MS analyses are not included (Feulner et al, 2009(Feulner et al, , 2011Ugur et al, 2010). Clifford and Abrankó (2017) pointed out the ambiguous nature of the trivial name isochlorogenic acid refering to different (di-)caffeoylquinic acids in literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%