2016 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2016.7838437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FinFET performance with Si:P and Ge:Group-III-Metal metastable contact trench alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And then, we use R c = ρ c /L conact × 2, where L contact is the contact length, and the factor 2 arises because R c includes effects of both source and drain. In this discussion, we assume L contact = 8 nm In the Appendix, as a supplementary approach to discuss the effect of material-dependent ρ c , we provide another CV 2 vs. CV/I plot using R SD estimated from the best experimental ρ c reported in literatures for each material [55], [122], [134], [135] (also see Figs. 18-20).…”
Section: Discussion: Effects Of Contact Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And then, we use R c = ρ c /L conact × 2, where L contact is the contact length, and the factor 2 arises because R c includes effects of both source and drain. In this discussion, we assume L contact = 8 nm In the Appendix, as a supplementary approach to discuss the effect of material-dependent ρ c , we provide another CV 2 vs. CV/I plot using R SD estimated from the best experimental ρ c reported in literatures for each material [55], [122], [134], [135] (also see Figs. 18-20).…”
Section: Discussion: Effects Of Contact Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 24(a)-(c) shows simulation results for CV 2 vs. CV/I and relative comparison with Si CMOS using R SD estimated from the best experimental ρ c reported in literatures for each material, n-and p-Si [134], n-In 0.53 Ga 0.47 As [55] (see Fig. 18), n-Ge [122] (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in doping technology have exceeded 10 21 cm [30], and such heavy S/D doping could also enhance the drive current. Nevertheless, contact resistance remains one of the greatest challenges for 5 nm technology.…”
Section: Appl Sci 2018 8 54 8 Of 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Moreover, recent requirement of ultra-low contact resistivity pushes the employment of the high doping processes such as ISPD silicon epitaxial process by the phosphorous concentration at the source/drain up to 4 × 10 21 cm −3 . [13][14][15] This reduces the metal-semiconductor Schottky barrier width, which in turn increases the carrier tunneling and reduces the contact resistivity. 16) Despite the development on the growth of ISPD epitaxial silicon layer, certain challenges must first be overcome before the utilization in 3D devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%