“…Innovative developmental placement options included 'floating ', 'open', and 'workshop' placements, where groups of students were allocated to one or two staff members, and where student learning was a self-directed response to the issues and needs of people in a particular locality (Mupediziswa & Kubanga, 2016). There was mounting evidence that different placement settings and sites were being discussed, trialled, and evaluated (e.g., Beytell, 2014;Ferguson & Smith, 2012;Hoffman, 1993;Mupedziswa, 2001). Creativity and innovation had resulted in developing and placing students in non-traditional settings (Lombard, 1997), including social action and community-based placements (Ferguson & Smith, 2012;Gray & Simpson, 1998;Travis, McFarlin, van Rooyen, & Gray, 1999), while developmental models were trialled in some conventional settings (Neilson & Gray, 1997).…”