2007
DOI: 10.1139/z07-077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fidelity to calving areas in moose (Alces alces) in the absence of natural predators

Abstract: We used long-term monitoring (1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005) data from a moose (Alces alces (L., 1758)) population (i) to determine if moose cows are faithful to their calving sites and (ii) to examine the effect of previous recruitment success on calving-site fidelity. We generated null hypotheses from the distances between calving sites used by other individuals inside the home range of each cow. The calving sites used in successive years by individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, breeding female wildebeest were responsible for over three times as many range switches as non‐breeders within the two migratory ranges (Table 2). This result runs contrary to past research that has found either no correlation or a positive correlation between reproductive success and fidelity (Schaefer, Bergman & Luttich 2000; Hoover 2003; Tremblay et al. 2007).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, breeding female wildebeest were responsible for over three times as many range switches as non‐breeders within the two migratory ranges (Table 2). This result runs contrary to past research that has found either no correlation or a positive correlation between reproductive success and fidelity (Schaefer, Bergman & Luttich 2000; Hoover 2003; Tremblay et al. 2007).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It seems here that the females did not favor the areas with any shrubs during calving because the number of shrubby areas where the moose were found increased significantly after the calf's birth. Poole et al (2007) suggested that the selection of calving sites by ungulates is related to trade-offs between minimizing risk of predation and meeting nutritional needs for lactation, while Trembley, Solberg, Saether, and Heim (2007) suggested a need to determine which factors influence the selection of a calving area based on the risk perceived by females. Our results emphasized a need for both good cover and good visibility.…”
Section: Calving Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site fidelity has been shown to be influenced by past reproductive success (e.g., Switzer 1997, Tremblay et al 2007, The´riault et al 2012). In addition, both the IDD and IFD models assume that individuals have perfect (ideal) knowledge about resource availability and density dependence functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%