2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01941.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wet season range fidelity in a tropical migratory ungulate

Abstract: Summary1. In migratory populations, the degree of fidelity and dispersal among seasonal ranges is an important population process with consequences for demography, management, sensitivity to habitat change and adaptation to local environmental conditions. 2. Characterizing patterns of range fidelity in ungulates, however, has remained challenging because of the difficulties of following large numbers of marked individuals across multiple migratory cycles and of identifying the appropriate scale of analysis. 3.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the low initial error rates observed with Wild-ID, we did not test other software platforms nor attempt to further optimize the Wild-ID scoring algorithm. Photo ID applications aimed at species with more challenging natural marking patterns [20] or species with evolving marks [19] may require either optimization of the Wild-ID scoring algorithm [13] or modeling of the error process. Indeed, new methods are already being developed to accommodate photoID errors in capture-recapture modeling [30] including errors involving evolving natural marks [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the low initial error rates observed with Wild-ID, we did not test other software platforms nor attempt to further optimize the Wild-ID scoring algorithm. Photo ID applications aimed at species with more challenging natural marking patterns [20] or species with evolving marks [19] may require either optimization of the Wild-ID scoring algorithm [13] or modeling of the error process. Indeed, new methods are already being developed to accommodate photoID errors in capture-recapture modeling [30] including errors involving evolving natural marks [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.0.1 [13]; http://www.dartmouth.edu/~envs/faculty/bolger.html). To date, Wild-ID has been used to accurately identify wildebeest ( Connochaetes taurinus [20]) and giraffe ( Giraffa camelopardis [13]). This software uses the SIFT (Scale Invariant Feature Transform) algorithm to characterize variable patterns within photographs and compare all combinations of photographs in a database [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,15-17,20,21,23]) but it has only recently been described in a few tropical ungulates (African buffalo Syncerus caffer [19]; wildebeest [47]). Our findings constitute the first description to our knowledge of a partial migration pattern in an impala population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18]) or to a wet season range in a tropical ungulate (e.g. [47]) is considered to provide benefits related to familiarity with the location of resources, predators or conspecifics [53]. The impalas that we monitored had all been introduced at the same release site located in the south range (Figure 1) which therefore may be more familiar than the north range and may provide some predator-avoidance benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximate boundaries of the TE are Lake Natron to the north, Simanjiro plains to the southeast, and Irangi Hills to the southwest, with the Rift Valley 110 escarpment forming the western boundary (Lamprey 1964;Morrison and Bolger 2012). Rain occurs almost exclusively from November-May.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%