2010
DOI: 10.1002/latj.201090006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femtosecond vs. Picosecond Laser Material Processing

Abstract: Laser materials processing has been an intensive research topic since the invention of the laser. nowadays, lasers are used as efficient and qualified tools in many industrial processes, like heavy industrial cutting, hardening, and welding. however, as the miniaturization of components and devices is progressing, finer structures are required. here, the flexible laser processing with conventional laser sources is typically limited by thermal or mechanical damage (melting, formation of burr and cracks, changes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the textures processed on Ti6Al4V plates were generated by defining several critical laser parameters: pulse energy, light polarization, spot size on the sample and overlapping of spots on the sample. As it was also reported in others studies,9, 14 the texturing generated by the femtosecond laser was of high quality, which was characterized by a small re‐deposition on the edges of the deposited material and a very small thermally affected zone. In our experiment, only the edges of the 60‐μm microgrooves, with a minor increase in aluminum element, seemed to correspond to a heat‐affected zone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the current study, the textures processed on Ti6Al4V plates were generated by defining several critical laser parameters: pulse energy, light polarization, spot size on the sample and overlapping of spots on the sample. As it was also reported in others studies,9, 14 the texturing generated by the femtosecond laser was of high quality, which was characterized by a small re‐deposition on the edges of the deposited material and a very small thermally affected zone. In our experiment, only the edges of the 60‐μm microgrooves, with a minor increase in aluminum element, seemed to correspond to a heat‐affected zone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The significance of pulsewidth on the ablation behavior of metals was clearly demonstrated in [2] where the ablation threshold in a Ni film with 0.5-ps UV pulses was 100 times lower than with 14-ns pulses of the same wavelength. The results of [2] and subsequent studies [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] led to the generally accepted view that the lowest energy threshold and the best ablation quality are attainable with short (picosecond/femtosecond) pulses; the removal of material starts soon after laser irradiation with a minimal amount of melting. In contrast, with longer pulses, the heating, melting, and vaporization occur during the energy deposition that results in energy losses associated with heat conduction as well as with plasma development above the target [2,5,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In practice, pulse energies in the range of 1-100 μJ are appropriate for typical focusing conditions. Scaling the average power by an increased repetition rate at constant pulse energy instead, high scanning speeds are necessary, as the pulse overlap has to be controlled to avoid thermalization of the process, which leads to a reduced ablation quality [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%