2020
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2019.2910595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Pyramid and Hierarchical Boosting Network for Pavement Crack Detection

Abstract: Pavement crack detection is a critical task for insuring road safety. Manual crack detection is extremely timeconsuming. Therefore, an automatic road crack detection method is required to boost this progress. However, it remains a challenging task due to the intensity inhomogeneity of cracks and complexity of the background, e.g., the low contrast with surrounding pavements and possible shadows with similar intensity. Inspired by recent advances of deep learning in computer vision, we propose a novel network a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
381
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 581 publications
(392 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
381
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 7, it is clear that proposed U-HDN achieves high performance compared with other algorithms in terms of ODS and OIS. Methods ODS OIS HED [74] 0.042 0.626 RCF [64] 0.462 0.607 FCN [82] 0.322 0.609 CrackForest [44] 0.231 0.104 FPHBN [78] 0.492 0.705 U-net [65] 0.752 0.897 U-HDN 0.783 0.928 U-HDN (only using AigleRN) 0.927 0.912…”
Section: Aiglern Dataset Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 7, it is clear that proposed U-HDN achieves high performance compared with other algorithms in terms of ODS and OIS. Methods ODS OIS HED [74] 0.042 0.626 RCF [64] 0.462 0.607 FCN [82] 0.322 0.609 CrackForest [44] 0.231 0.104 FPHBN [78] 0.492 0.705 U-net [65] 0.752 0.897 U-HDN 0.783 0.928 U-HDN (only using AigleRN) 0.927 0.912…”
Section: Aiglern Dataset Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most neural network methods utilize custom made neural networks, there are papers that build on existing neural networks. For example, the work in [67] partly used a pretrained VGG; the work in [9] utilized YOLOv2 [68]; whereas the works in [7,8] built on U-Net [69]. Neural networks combined with image histograms and other separate feature extraction methods have been applied for these problems as well [70].…”
Section: Source Input Data and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface to inspect is however extensive, making a manual inspection time-intensive and prone to errors. As a result, efforts have been made in the recent years to detect cracks in an automatic manner [4,32,18,20,35,25,22,30,29,3,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Crack500 [32] (b) DeepCrack [18] (c) SDNet2018 [20] (d) CrackTree [35] (e) CCIC* [25] (f) Codebrim [22] (g) AigleRN [4] (h) CrackForest [30] Secondly, some methods only classify images [20,22,25] as containing a crack or not. The shapes and widths of the cracks are not provided, although it can be an important information for assessing the cracks' severity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%