2020
DOI: 10.5201/ipol.2020.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An 'All Terrain' Crack Detector Obtained by Deep Learning on Available Databases

Abstract: We present a general deep learning method for detecting cracks on all sorts of surfaces. For making this method robust to different types of cracks and acquisition procedures, we have trained our method on four datasets-Crack500, DeepCrack, SDNet2018 and CrackForest. We have also labelled a part of the SDNet2018 dataset so that it contains semantic labels, as it originally only proposed crack/non-crack classifications on the image level. To validate our approach, we perform a cross-dataset study where we train… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its significant success in the field of image segmentation is attributed to two of its peculiarities: the classification occurs at the level of individual pixels, and, therefore, it is particularly adept at recognizing object edges and boundaries and the learning process is feasible with a reduced number of images. In this research, a modern version of the U-NET network has been implemented [50], which was published in 2020 and dedicated to the recognition of cracks in various types of materials. This version was obtained through training on a dataset obtained by merging multiple specific sub-datasets for cracks (Crack500 [51], DeepCrack [52], SDNet2018 [53], CrackForest [54]).…”
Section: Dnn Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its significant success in the field of image segmentation is attributed to two of its peculiarities: the classification occurs at the level of individual pixels, and, therefore, it is particularly adept at recognizing object edges and boundaries and the learning process is feasible with a reduced number of images. In this research, a modern version of the U-NET network has been implemented [50], which was published in 2020 and dedicated to the recognition of cracks in various types of materials. This version was obtained through training on a dataset obtained by merging multiple specific sub-datasets for cracks (Crack500 [51], DeepCrack [52], SDNet2018 [53], CrackForest [54]).…”
Section: Dnn Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GAPs v2 subset in [53] and SDNet2018 [119] with over 50k images for classification are steps in the right direction but it would also be beneficial to have annotated data for the segmentation and quantification tasks. A simple solution for this would be to collate several of the datasets such as proposed in [132]. However, there still is the issue with incorrect labels, which spans across several datasets in this space as outlined in subsubsection VI-A2.…”
Section: A Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research studies related to concrete crack image classification (e.g. [10,15,22] ) have deployed advanced computational resources and trained the used models using Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). All the experiments in this paper were conducted in Google Colaboratory (Colab) with the 12GB NVIDIA Tesla K80 GPU provided by the platform.…”
Section: Experimentation On the Proposed Dataset Using Dcnnsmentioning
confidence: 99%