2000
DOI: 10.1109/24.914547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-tolerant evolvable hardware using field-programmable transistor arrays

Abstract: Abstract-The paper presents an evolutionary approach to the design of fault-tolerant VLSI (very large scale integrated) circuits using EHW (evolvable hardware). The EHW research area comprises a set of applications where GA (genetic algorithm) are used for the automatic synthesis and adaptation of electronic circuits. EHW is particularly suitable for applications requiring changes in task requirements and in the environment or faults, through its ability to reconfigure the hardware structure dynamically and au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRR, by virtue of depending on a population of higher-fit alternatives that are evaluated temporally over many iterations, precludes the need for rollback of configurations and ensures higher populational fault tolerance capability. Significantly, as opposed to the work of Keymeulen in populational fault tolerance [Keymeulen00], CRR achieves device refurbishment at runtime, while ensuring sustainable levels of throughput with graceful degradation. As compared to the Roving STARs approach [Abramovici01], CRR minimizes detection latency, as faults are evident immediately upon a discrepancy at the outputs.…”
Section: Refurbishment Of a Unique Failed Configuration -3× × × ×3 Mumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CRR, by virtue of depending on a population of higher-fit alternatives that are evaluated temporally over many iterations, precludes the need for rollback of configurations and ensures higher populational fault tolerance capability. Significantly, as opposed to the work of Keymeulen in populational fault tolerance [Keymeulen00], CRR achieves device refurbishment at runtime, while ensuring sustainable levels of throughput with graceful degradation. As compared to the Roving STARs approach [Abramovici01], CRR minimizes detection latency, as faults are evident immediately upon a discrepancy at the outputs.…”
Section: Refurbishment Of a Unique Failed Configuration -3× × × ×3 Mumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, recent research has focused on employing the capability for reconfiguration inherent in field programmable devices to increase reliability and autonomy [Keymeulen00] [Lohn03] [DeMara05a] [Moore05] [Zhang05]. In these experiments, fault-tolerance is evolved at design-time, or achieved at repair-time using evolution after taking a detected failed unit offline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stefatos and Arslan [12]proposed a twolayered fault-tolerant VLSI architecture where the second layer provides for detection and correction of the first layer. At NASA, field-programmable transistor arrays (FPTA) are evolved to be fault-tolerant [7] and fault-recovering [17]. Genetic representations are also investigated with regards to fault recovery on FPGAs [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolutionary process, which utilizes techniques such as crossover and mutation, continues till a perfect repair is found, or the pre-determined number of generations is evolved. Refer to [6] for a more detailed description of evolution and GAs, and to [2] for a description of the main concepts in Evolvable Hardware (EHW).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%