2016
DOI: 10.12740/pp/onlinefirst/42894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family therapy process − works on the Polish version of SCORE-15 tool

Abstract: The preliminary analysis of data obtained during the research project conducted in Outpatient Family Therapy Clinic, Department of Adult, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital in Krakow and in Laboratory of Psychology and Systemic Psychotherapy, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Jagiellonian University Medical College between 2010 and 2014 revealed that SCORE-15 is a useful tool in research on changes in the systemic family therapy process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect sizes were small, however, which is in line with previous UK data, where a significant, but relatively small, reduction of total SCORE-15 scores have been shown following family interventions (Hamilton et al, 2015). There are, however, also some contradictory results, which indicate less responsiveness to change following three family intervention sessions in a Polish sample by Jozefik et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Effect sizes were small, however, which is in line with previous UK data, where a significant, but relatively small, reduction of total SCORE-15 scores have been shown following family interventions (Hamilton et al, 2015). There are, however, also some contradictory results, which indicate less responsiveness to change following three family intervention sessions in a Polish sample by Jozefik et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In some validation studies, the factor structure of the SCORE was not tested (Jewell et al, 2013;J ozefik et al, 2015;Teh et al, 2017;Vilac ßa et al, 2015). A number of studies did not include additional psychometric measures to facilitate validation (e.g., Jewell et al, 2013;J ozefik et al, 2015;Stratton et al, 2010Stratton et al, , 2014Teh et al, 2017). In some studies, means and standard deviations for all SCORE scales were not reported (J ozefik et al, 2015;Teh et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies did not include additional psychometric measures to facilitate validation (e.g., Jewell et al, 2013;J ozefik et al, 2015;Stratton et al, 2010Stratton et al, , 2014Teh et al, 2017). In some studies, means and standard deviations for all SCORE scales were not reported (J ozefik et al, 2015;Teh et al, 2017). Future validation studies of existing versions of the SCORE should, where possible, avoid these shortcomings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies in this evidence base involved over 3,000 individuals from over 100 sites in four countries. Thirteen studies were conducted in English, one used a Portuguese translation of the SCORE-15 (Vilaça et al 2015), and in another a Polish translation of the SCORE-15 was used (Józefik et al 2015). There were males and females in a range of family roles at all stages of the family life cycle.…”
Section: Psychometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%