2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.psi.2016.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Family Education and Support” program for families at psychosocial risk: The role of implementation process

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper analyses the implementation characteristics of the Family Education and Support program, a theory-driven, needs-based, and evidence-based positive parenting program originally developed for the Andalusian family preservation services. The implementation process of 34 trials of the FAF program with 155 participants was analyzed. Cluster analyses were also performed to explore variability in implementation conditions from a comprehensive perspective. Results showed different implementat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
13

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we note the importance of promoting parental practices that are not authoritarian and are based on affection and warmth, which contribute to the well-adjusted psychosocial behavior of children and their lower engagement in violent behavior. It is significant to note that this communitarian study is fully in line with other Spanish research studies that have indicated similar facilitators and barriers to the implementation of an evidence-based parenting intervention to efficiently contribute to positive parenting practices [19,20,67,68]. In addition, the role of sex and age must be taken into account because of the complexity of the relationship between proactive violence and parenting styles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we note the importance of promoting parental practices that are not authoritarian and are based on affection and warmth, which contribute to the well-adjusted psychosocial behavior of children and their lower engagement in violent behavior. It is significant to note that this communitarian study is fully in line with other Spanish research studies that have indicated similar facilitators and barriers to the implementation of an evidence-based parenting intervention to efficiently contribute to positive parenting practices [19,20,67,68]. In addition, the role of sex and age must be taken into account because of the complexity of the relationship between proactive violence and parenting styles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…During adolescence, peer social relations and the worries arising from them acquire greater relevance than in earlier life stages. However, the importance of the family is not diluted but, instead, remains an essential reference and determining factor at this developmental stage and in the children’s psychosocial well-being [19,20,21]. The family interaction system sets the stage that determines the repertoire of adolescents’ behaviors, and their greater or smaller possibilities of being violent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these societies, relationships between generations are expected to be vertical and hierarchical, assuming strictness and imposition as a main part of parental responsibility. Strict authoritarian discipline is perceived as beneficial for the children, and its absence would be regarded as a lack of supervision and care (Dwairy & Achoui, 2006;Grusec, Rudy, & Martini, 1997).…”
Section: Is the Optimum Parenting Style Always Authoritative?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-esteem has been one of the traditional positive socialization outcomes analyzed in parenting studies (e.g., Rudy & Grusec, 2006) and is considered as a key indicator of personal adjustment and well-being (Klein, 2017;Meléndez-Moral, Fortuna-Terrero, Sales-Galán, & Mayordomo-Rodríguez, 2015;Musitu, Jimenez, Murgui, 2007;Riquelme, García, & Serra, 2018;Veiga, García, Reeve, Wentzel, & García, 2015). The internalization of social values is another important socialization outcome (Grusec et al, 2017;Grusec et al, 1997;Rudy & Grusec, 2001). Internalization of values, defined as "taking over the values and attitudes of society as one's own so that socially acceptable behavior is motivated not by anticipation of external consequences but by intrinsic or internal factors" (Grusec & Goodnow, 1994, p. 4), has been established as a key indicator of successful socialization that fosters empathy and consideration for others, and is important for adult development (e.g., Baumrind, 1983;Darling & Steinberg, 1993;Fung, 2013;Hoffman, 1970;Lewis, 1981;Sortheix & Schwartz, 2017;Williams, Ciarrochi, & Heaven, 2015).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre los aspectos comunicativos abordados, están la resolución conjunta de problemas (Irvine et al, 2015;Romero et al, 2017;Sieving et al, 2016), la resolución interactiva de conflictos (Amaya et al, 2016;Hidalgo et al, 2014;Hidalgo et al, 2016;Rodríguez;Cruz, 2016;Tsang;Low, 2016), y el diálogo (Destin;Svoboda, 2017;Mejía;Ulph;Calam, 2016;Ramirez et al, 2012;Tarantino et al, 2014;Thomas;Parthasarathy;Bhugra, 2013), una práctica abordada por 32 de los 52 estudios, siendo la más incluida al desagregar los tópicos de crianza.…”
Section: Gráfico 1 -Frecuencias De Las Intervenciones De Acuerdo Con unclassified