2000
DOI: 10.1108/09600030010325966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies

Abstract: In the last decade, we have witnessed companies investing in financially and laboriously expensive enterprise information technologies (EITs) that unify the internal and external supply chains for the purpose of gaining strategic advantages. As performance metrics data resulting from such investments are beginning to emerge, both practitioners and researchers are taking a critical look at whether these systems indeed produced the benefits proclaimed by their proponents at the pre‐implementation stages. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of this component is to investigate and analyse the current position of the organisation's internal function with respect to its supply chain management. This argument is parallel to what has been discussed by Ellinger (2000), Ferguson (2000), and Sarkis and Sundarraj (2000), where the effectiveness and supportiveness of the internal function is the key factor in making organisations work smoothly and successfully in their supply chain. Moreover, any improvement such as resources reallocation, revaluing business process and technology installation in the internal activities could reflect on the effectiveness of the whole SCM.…”
Section: Knowledge-based Systemsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The importance of this component is to investigate and analyse the current position of the organisation's internal function with respect to its supply chain management. This argument is parallel to what has been discussed by Ellinger (2000), Ferguson (2000), and Sarkis and Sundarraj (2000), where the effectiveness and supportiveness of the internal function is the key factor in making organisations work smoothly and successfully in their supply chain. Moreover, any improvement such as resources reallocation, revaluing business process and technology installation in the internal activities could reflect on the effectiveness of the whole SCM.…”
Section: Knowledge-based Systemsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…While some of the literature supports these ERP benefits and cites examples of successful implementations (for example [14,24,29]), there are also cases where benefits have failed to be realised (for example [3,25]). Mixed results indicate that further research is needed, and the reasons for certain implementations producing greater benefits than others need to be clarified.…”
Section: Benefits Of Erp Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the first phase of organisational performance measurement, much of the ERP literature focuses solely on the financial impact (for example [15,24]). However, comparable to the critics of traditional firm measurement techniques, Sarkis and Sundarraj [25] criticise this technique for focusing on only one set of measures. As a result, a number of more balanced ERP PMSs (focusing on both financial and non-financial measures) have emerged.…”
Section: Organisational and Erp Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adapted from Sarkis and Sundarraj (2000) except for the last row, the information for which is provided by the authors.…”
Section: Multiple-criteria Analysis and Performance Measurement: Methmentioning
confidence: 99%