2013
DOI: 10.12809/hkmj134063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting implementation of accreditation programmes and the impact of the accreditation process on quality improvement in hospitals: a SWOT analysis

Abstract: By relating the findings to the operational issues of accreditation, this review discussed the implications for successful implementation and how accreditation may drive quality improvement. These findings have implications for various stakeholders (government, the public, patients and health care providers), when it comes to embarking on accreditation exercises.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
69
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
69
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…3,6,9 In line with this assertion, the interviewed professionals referred that the cancelation of the certification did not directly impose the loss of important Accreditation principles: [ The abovementioned excerpts are considered very important because, as mentioned, the Accreditation process may or may not result in a quality certification. Nevertheless, due to the fact that its logic is essentially based on the organization's continuing education instead of the bureaucratic form of surveillance, 3,5 it is clear that, despite the plausible suffering caused to the professionals deriving from the cancelation of the certification, the organization seems to have understood the essence of the Accreditation process because the professionals' reports indicate that the cancelation by itself did not impose the complete loss of the process.…”
Section: Disqualification Of the Certification: Insufficient Motive Tmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,6,9 In line with this assertion, the interviewed professionals referred that the cancelation of the certification did not directly impose the loss of important Accreditation principles: [ The abovementioned excerpts are considered very important because, as mentioned, the Accreditation process may or may not result in a quality certification. Nevertheless, due to the fact that its logic is essentially based on the organization's continuing education instead of the bureaucratic form of surveillance, 3,5 it is clear that, despite the plausible suffering caused to the professionals deriving from the cancelation of the certification, the organization seems to have understood the essence of the Accreditation process because the professionals' reports indicate that the cancelation by itself did not impose the complete loss of the process.…”
Section: Disqualification Of the Certification: Insufficient Motive Tmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…That is important because the Accreditation develops ongoing cycles of learning and improvements that culminate in the enhancement of the health care quality and this means much more than the certification itself. 6 The quality tools are techniques used to define, measure, analyze and propose solutions to problems that can interfere in the work process and; in the context of the accreditation, the use of the PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act) cycle is highlighted; flow charts; checklists, brainstorming and others, adapted to the reality and needs of the organization. 2 In that sense, it is apparent that the above citations are relevant, as they converge to the reflection that, despite having lost the accreditation certificate, the hospital continues using the quality tools.…”
Section: Disqualification Of the Certification: Insufficient Motive Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accreditation process requires that the accrediting body recognizes that a healthcare organization is complying with standards including environmental aspects. Further on, within the hospital setting a multidisciplinary team should be responsible to improve environmental management practices and performance [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29][30] It is observed that, despite the MS having instituted the PNSP, in order to minimize the damages resulting from health care, two hospital organizations are still in the implementation phase of patient safety strategies. This may be due to hospitals' difficulties in developing a positive safety culture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%