2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2366-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of parameter settings in calculation of hybrid similarities: effects of first- and second-order similarity, edge cutting, and weighting factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glänzel and Thijs [ 10 , 19 ] found that choosing the weights of citation-based similarity as 0.875 and 0.833 can obtain a balanced combination of two types of similarities. Meyer-Brötz et al [ 30 ] found that decreasing the textual weight can obtain a more coherent clustering result and set the weights as 0.5 or 0.6 to obtain the best result. In this study, Fig 4 shows the F1 measure and RI values with different values of parameter α .…”
Section: Dataset and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Glänzel and Thijs [ 10 , 19 ] found that choosing the weights of citation-based similarity as 0.875 and 0.833 can obtain a balanced combination of two types of similarities. Meyer-Brötz et al [ 30 ] found that decreasing the textual weight can obtain a more coherent clustering result and set the weights as 0.5 or 0.6 to obtain the best result. In this study, Fig 4 shows the F1 measure and RI values with different values of parameter α .…”
Section: Dataset and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the dataset used, first, the optimal parameters related to the weights of citation- and text-based similarities were analyzed according to the F1 measure and RI metrics. Different parameter sets have significant influences on the clustering results, which were also analyzed by Meng et al [ 20 ] and Meyer-Brötz et al [ 30 ]. Based on the optimal weight of the citation-based similarity, i.e., setting 0.55 as the weight of citation-based similarity in the hybrid similarity, four comparative groups with different parameter sets were discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TF-IDF in Appendix A.2). Next, NetCulator calculates hybrid second-order similarities (See Appendix A.2) with severe edge cutting [24]. The latter improves the calculation speed by ignoring all weak edges that result from weak coupling between nodes.…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%