Developmental tendencies in the academic field of intellectual property through the identification of invisible colleges

Abstract

Intellectual property became a relevant academic cross-disciplinary field in an international context with the demand for the global governance of knowledge. However, the degree of consolidation of cross-disciplinary academic communities is not clear. To determine how closely related are these communities, this paper proposes a mixed methodology to find invisible colleges in the production of intellectual property. Scientific articles from 1994 to 2016 were extracted from Web of Science, taking into account the signature of the agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights in the early 90's. A total of 1,580 papers were processed through bibliographic coupling network analysis. A special technique was applied, which combines algorithms of community detection and defines a population of articles through thresholds of shared references. To contrast the invisible colleges that emerged with the existence of formal institutional relations, a qualitative tracking of the authors was made with respect to their institutional affiliation, lines of research, and meeting places. Both methods show that the subjects of interest can be grouped into 13 thematic modules related to the intellectual property field. Even though most are related to Law and Economics, there are weak linkages between disciplines which could indicate the construction of a cross-disciplinary field.

Women's Footprint in Anti-Doping Sciences: A Bibliometric Approach to Research Impact

“…Bibliometric analyses can identify key researchers and research hubs to facilitate collaboration and the dissemination and implementation of knowledge, opportunities for new collaborations for multidisciplinary work, and cognate subject areas that can bring fresh approaches, new expertise, and new methodologies to anti-doping. It can also detect the so-called “invisible colleges” (Newman, 2004 ; Palacios-Núñez et al, 2018 ) that may help or hinder research development.…”

A Scientometric Analysis of Institutions in the International Business Research

“…The resolution parameter γ (γ > 0) influences the number and sizes of clusters. This level of control is crucial because it gives more flexibility in identifying relevant communities, especially in exploratory analysis (Palacios-Núñez et al, 2018). Different from traditional weighted modularity clustering (Muff et al, 2005), there is no general optimum value of γ, and it is recommended to test different values for the resolution parameter for a satisfactory level of detail for the research goals (D'Angelo & Magnusson, 2021).…”

Uma Análise Cientométrica Sobre Instituições Na Pesquisa De Negócios Internacionais

“…O parâmetro de resolução γ (γ > 0) influencia o número e tamanhos dos agrupamentos. Este nível de controle é crucial pois dá mais flexibilidade à identificação de comunidades relevantes, especialmente em análises exploratórias (Palacios-Núñez et al, 2018). Diferente do tradicional agrupamento de modularidade ponderada (Muff et al, 2005), não existe um valor ótimo geral de γ, sendo recomendado testar diferentes valores para o parâmetro de resolução, obtendo um nível de detalhe satisfatório para os objetivos da pesquisa (D'Angelo & Magnusson, 2021).…”