2018
DOI: 10.21829/myb.2018.2401909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiencias de gobernanza multinivel en México: innovación para la reducción de emisiones de carbono de los ecosistemas terrestres

Abstract: La gobernanza ha sido definida de muchas maneras en su reciente auge de popularidad. Este artículo busca aportar a las discusiones continuas alrededor del tema, presentando resultados del estudio “Gobernanza multinivel y gestión del carbono a nivel de paisaje”, realizado en México entre 2014 y 2016 por el Centro para la Investigación Forestal Internacional [Cifor]. Se combina la presentación de resultados de este componente del Estudio Comparativo Global sobre REDD+ de Cifor con dos casos de estudio, para visl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Monzón et al [140] support the idea that ecosystem services should be at the core of protected area management structures, but governance schemes should support making good use of ecosystem services [141]. These schemes should follow a multi-level governance arrangement based on the vertical coordination between different European, national and subnational institutions to actively involve all these levels in policymaking [142].…”
Section: From Theory To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monzón et al [140] support the idea that ecosystem services should be at the core of protected area management structures, but governance schemes should support making good use of ecosystem services [141]. These schemes should follow a multi-level governance arrangement based on the vertical coordination between different European, national and subnational institutions to actively involve all these levels in policymaking [142].…”
Section: From Theory To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skutsch and Turnhout [41] argue that REDD+ national projects may be focusing on the wrong actors (or deforestation drivers), with greater attention given to communities with small-scale slash and burn agriculture and traditional forest practices while largely ignoring commercial and industrial agriculture as major deforestation drivers. Trying to implement a multi-level governance approach to pursue REDD+ at the local and subnational levels has also been difficult, since municipal governments have very limited influence on land-use decision-making and regulation, and state and federal governments maintain a lopsided share of authority and control over land use [42]. Unfortunately, at the federal political and economic levels of REDD+ implementation, there is a lack of government commitment towards transitioning to low carbon development in Mexico [27].…”
Section: Challenges To Redd+ Implementation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la búsqueda de otros modelos de gobernanza ambiental más eficientes, diversos autores han propuesto abordar la interacción entre los actores y la problemática socioambiental desde otras perspectivas: adaptativa (Barriga et al, 2007;Folke et al, 2005;Schultz et al, 2019;Trimble, 2019), multinivel (Libert-Amico et al, 2018;Trench et al, 2018), policéntrica (Ostrom, 2014;Ostrom, 2009;Urquiza et al, 2019), y territorial (García y Moyano, 2019;Tirado Ballesteros, 2019). La mayoría de los estudios se han centrado en identificar las fallas en la coordinación y cooperación entre actores nacionales e internacionales, en la falta de integración y consideración de los asuntos ambientales, en la presencia de los actores gubernamentales, o en las tensiones entre los intereses ambientales y los intereses económicos de los gobiernos y sociedades (Aguilar, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified