2021
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/abdfe8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excited-state quantum phase transitions

Abstract: We review the effects of excited-state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) in interacting many-body systems with finite numbers of collective degrees of freedom. We classify typical ESQPT signatures in the spectra of energy eigenstates with respect to the underlying classical dynamics and outline a variety of quantum systems in which they occur. We describe thermodynamic and dynamic consequences of ESQPTs, like those in microcanonical thermodynamics, quantum quench dynamics, and in the response to nearly adiaba… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 266 publications
1
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ESQPT differs from the one in the LMG model; the ESQPTs in the CT model are identified by a nonanalyticity in the first derivative of the density of states at the critical energies. This can be explained due to the fact that the number of effective degrees of freedom in this model is f = 2 and, for a nondegenerate critical point, the nonanaliticity is expected to appear in the f − 1th derivative of the energy level density [43,75]. The difference between this case and the LMG case ( f = 1) is obvious comparing the LMG and CT density of states in Figs.…”
Section: B Coupled Top Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This ESQPT differs from the one in the LMG model; the ESQPTs in the CT model are identified by a nonanalyticity in the first derivative of the density of states at the critical energies. This can be explained due to the fact that the number of effective degrees of freedom in this model is f = 2 and, for a nondegenerate critical point, the nonanaliticity is expected to appear in the f − 1th derivative of the energy level density [43,75]. The difference between this case and the LMG case ( f = 1) is obvious comparing the LMG and CT density of states in Figs.…”
Section: B Coupled Top Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We can identify ESQPTs either by fixing the energy while varying the control parameter of the model or, equivalently, by increasing the energy at a fixed value of the control parameter. The ESQPT refers to a nonanalytical behavior of the density 032145-2 of states ν(E ) = k δ(E − E k ) with E k the eigenenergies of the Hamiltonian, i.e., H = k E k |k k| [7,11]. As the system approaches an ESQPT in the LMG, the density of states develops a logarithmic divergence ν(E ) ∝ − log |E − E c | due to a concentration of the energy levels at E c = 0 [14,77,78] and for h < 1 which is the critical region for the ESQPT in the Hamiltonian (4).…”
Section: Model and Key Quantities Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While typically QPTs are exhibited in the ground state of a many-body system, certain special Hamiltonians may give rise to so-called excited-state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Like their more traditional counterpart, ESQPTs are characterized by a similarly closing energy gap between excited states and, additionally, the density of states becomes singular around a critical excitation energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a Hamiltonian explains several quantum many-body phenomena in spinor condensates [34,35], including the generation of macroscopic entanglement [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], with potential metrological applications [50], and the observation of nonequilibrium phenomena such as the formation of spin domains and topological defects [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Recently, dynamical [62] and excitedstate [63] quantum phase transitions have been theoretically [64,65] and experimentally [66,67] studied in spin-1 BECs with spin-changing collisions. Here we exploit this map to provide a many-body protocol to access the ferromagnetic stripe phase of the SOC gas via crossing a quantum phase transition of the low-energy Hamiltonian in an excited state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%