2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.104.034119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signatures of excited-state quantum phase transitions in quantum many-body systems: Phase space analysis

Abstract: Using the Husimi quasiprobability distribution, we investigate the phase space signatures of excited-state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick and coupled top models. We show that the ESQPT is evinced by the dynamics of the Husimi function, that exhibits a distinct time dependence in the different ESQPT phases. We also discuss how to identify the ESQPT signatures from the long-time averaged Husimi function and its associated marginal distributions. Moreover, from the calculated secon… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And third, the broken-symmetry phase at > extends up to a certain critical energy, , at which an ESQPT takes place; below this energy, the spectrum is composed by parity doublets exactly degenerate in the TL [29,36]. As typical examples, we quote the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], the Dicke and Rabi models [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], spinor Bose-Einstein condensates [55], the coupled top [56] and the two-site Bose-Hubbard model [57].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And third, the broken-symmetry phase at > extends up to a certain critical energy, , at which an ESQPT takes place; below this energy, the spectrum is composed by parity doublets exactly degenerate in the TL [29,36]. As typical examples, we quote the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], the Dicke and Rabi models [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], spinor Bose-Einstein condensates [55], the coupled top [56] and the two-site Bose-Hubbard model [57].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, V (x) = V (−x), and therefore Eq. ( 1) is a toy model for one degree of freedom systems with a Z 2 symmetry, like the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick and the two-fluid Lipkin model, the two-site Bose-Hubbard, the coupled top, and the Dicke and the Rabi models [17,[20][21][22]32,34,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. If b 0, the single critical point is x c1 = 0, whereas if b 0 there appears a second pair of critical points, x c2, 3 the QPT and the emergence of the critical ESQPT.…”
Section: Classical Toy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although all numerical results in this paper concern the fully-connected transverse-field Ising model, our theory is applicable to a broad class of collective quantum systems; as paradigmatic examples, we highlight the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model (LMG) model (a version of which is mathematically equivalent to the fully-connected transverse-field Ising model) [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53], the Rabi and Dicke models [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], the coupled top [65], spinor Bose-Einstein condensates [66], or the two-site Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian [67], to cite a few.…”
Section: Generic Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%