2016
DOI: 10.5455/jrmds.2016422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of widths of maxillary anterior teeth and their relation to the golden proportion in the southwestern part of Saudi Arabia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GP has been investigated and mentioned extensively in the dental literature (Levin, 1978, Preston, 1993, Qualtrough and Burke, 1994, Snow, 1999, Rosenstiel et al, 2000, Ward, 2001, Javaheri and Shahnavaz, 2002, Mahshid and Khoshvaghti, 2004, Simon, 2004, Hasanreisoglu et al, 2005, Ali Fayyad et al, 2006, Murthy and Ramani, 2008, Petricevic et al, 2008, Nikgoo et al, 2009, Chander et al, 2012, Pini et al, 2012, Meshramkar et al, 2013, Rossetti et al, 2013, Forster et al, 2013, Al-Marzok et al, 2013, Calçada et al, 2014, Sandeep et al, 2015, Jin et al, 2016, Bragatto et al, 2016, Kanaparthy et al, 2016, Koidou et al, 2018, Parciak et al, 2017, Al-Kaisy and Garib, 2017). It has been considered by many researchers as the most harmonious recurrent tooth-to-tooth ratio that occurs more consistently in aesthetically pleasing smiles (Richardson and Malhotra, 1975, Levin, 1978, Ward, 2001, Marquardt, 2002) and has long been proposed as an aesthetic guideline for restoring and replacing maxillary anterior teeth (Richer, 1971, Rosenstiel et al, 2001, Levin, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GP has been investigated and mentioned extensively in the dental literature (Levin, 1978, Preston, 1993, Qualtrough and Burke, 1994, Snow, 1999, Rosenstiel et al, 2000, Ward, 2001, Javaheri and Shahnavaz, 2002, Mahshid and Khoshvaghti, 2004, Simon, 2004, Hasanreisoglu et al, 2005, Ali Fayyad et al, 2006, Murthy and Ramani, 2008, Petricevic et al, 2008, Nikgoo et al, 2009, Chander et al, 2012, Pini et al, 2012, Meshramkar et al, 2013, Rossetti et al, 2013, Forster et al, 2013, Al-Marzok et al, 2013, Calçada et al, 2014, Sandeep et al, 2015, Jin et al, 2016, Bragatto et al, 2016, Kanaparthy et al, 2016, Koidou et al, 2018, Parciak et al, 2017, Al-Kaisy and Garib, 2017). It has been considered by many researchers as the most harmonious recurrent tooth-to-tooth ratio that occurs more consistently in aesthetically pleasing smiles (Richardson and Malhotra, 1975, Levin, 1978, Ward, 2001, Marquardt, 2002) and has long been proposed as an aesthetic guideline for restoring and replacing maxillary anterior teeth (Richer, 1971, Rosenstiel et al, 2001, Levin, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 However, Kanaparthy et al found that R2 in male and R1 in female correspond to the golden ratio whereas R1 in male and R2 in female do not. 10 Golden proportion was found only in R1 in 17% of samples from University of North Carolina. 32 Similarly, Iranian dental students showed existence of golden proportion only in R1 but not in R2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] This ratio has been found to vary with race, gender, and ethnicity. [8][9][10] In considering the factors affecting this perceived esthetic ratio, the vertical dimension of the face and malocclusion type has been given less importance. Hence, this study was carried out with the aim of assessing the apparent tooth to tooth proportion of maxillary anterior region and finding out the possible association with lower anterior facial height and malocclusion type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perception of dental esthetics varies significantly among dental professionals, although substantial efforts have been made to establish common standards [1] [2]. Research in the area of aesthetic perception has identified different factors that contribute to a beautiful face [3] like: sexual dimorphism, ethnic background, genetics, and environment [4]. Dental and facial esthetics are said to be optimized if the proportion between widths of maxillary anterior teeth is repeated when viewed from the front [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in the area of aesthetic perception has identified different factors that contribute to a beautiful face [3] like: sexual dimorphism, ethnic background, genetics, and environment [4]. Dental and facial esthetics are said to be optimized if the proportion between widths of maxillary anterior teeth is repeated when viewed from the front [3]. However, each individual is unique and the application of a generalized relationship seems not precise [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%