2020
DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Solubility of Luting Cements in Different Solutions

Abstract: <p><strong>Objective. </strong>To evaluate and compare the solubility of three luting cements in three different solutions: distilled water and artificial saliva with different pH values (7.4 and 3.0).</p><p><strong>Materials and Methods</strong>. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (GC Fuji Plus) and two resin cements (Multilink Automix and Variolink II) were used. A total of 45 specimens, 15 specimens (15x1 mm) for each cement, were prepared according to ISO standard… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute percentage of FG used in the experimental CBC was 2 wt.% calculated based on the resin matrix fraction, and this quantity corresponded to ~0.7% of the whole CBC mass. Considering that the mean solubility recently reported for two resin luting cements [ 52 ] ranged from 3.20 to 5.41 µg/mm 3 , depending on the pH value of the artificial saliva medium, it seems unlikely that the percentages used in the CBC prototype could generate any serious adverse biological effect. Further studies are necessary to establish the real risk related to the use of FG in dentistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute percentage of FG used in the experimental CBC was 2 wt.% calculated based on the resin matrix fraction, and this quantity corresponded to ~0.7% of the whole CBC mass. Considering that the mean solubility recently reported for two resin luting cements [ 52 ] ranged from 3.20 to 5.41 µg/mm 3 , depending on the pH value of the artificial saliva medium, it seems unlikely that the percentages used in the CBC prototype could generate any serious adverse biological effect. Further studies are necessary to establish the real risk related to the use of FG in dentistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%