2015
DOI: 10.2319/110113-798.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of salivary total oxidant-antioxidant status and DNA damage of children undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy

Abstract: Fixed orthodontic appliances bonded with the tested composites did not increase the cytotoxicity markers in saliva.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this decrease in cell viability was not statistically significant. A similar result was found in studies by Guler et al, [22] wherein no cytotoxic effect was seen in children undergoing orthodontic treatment during 3 months of the evaluation period. However, a study by Faccioni et al [13] and Hafez et al [21] showed decreased cellular viability among patients with orthodontic appliances as compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, this decrease in cell viability was not statistically significant. A similar result was found in studies by Guler et al, [22] wherein no cytotoxic effect was seen in children undergoing orthodontic treatment during 3 months of the evaluation period. However, a study by Faccioni et al [13] and Hafez et al [21] showed decreased cellular viability among patients with orthodontic appliances as compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results were in agreement with the results obtained by Guler et al, who reported similar findings in their study. 16 In one of the previous study conducted by Gonçalves et al, authors assessed the cytotoxic and genotoxic effect of non-soldered bands (NSB) and silver soldered bands (SSB) on the HepG 2 and HOK cell lines. They observed higher cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in SSB eluates in comparison to NSB samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, 66.7% of the studies that have investigated the salivary TAC in more serious oral diseases, including recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) (the most common oral ulcerative condition) [ 36 , 88 ], stem cell transplantation- (SCT-) related salivary gland injury due to graft versus host disease (GVHD) [ 92 ], oral mucositis induced by high-dose therapy of melphalan in myeloma patients treated with autologous SCT [ 22 ], cleft lip and palate [ 17 ], oral premalignant lesions (leukoplakia, lichen planus, and erythroplakia) [ 13 15 , 23 , 29 , 49 , 83 , 113 , 128 ], and oral cancers [ 14 , 24 ], found decreased levels of salivary TAC in these patients ( Table 1 ). Furthermore, salivary TAC was decreased also in patients with peri-implant disease [ 81 ] and in children undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy [ 54 ].…”
Section: Infection and Oral And Renal Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%