Abstract:Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) is a biomarker often used in order to investigate oxidative stress in many pathological conditions. Saliva and urine can be collected noninvasively and represent attractive diagnostic fluids for detecting biomarkers of various pathological conditions. The reviewed case-control and intervention studies that measured salivary or urinary TAC revealed that diseases, antioxidant foods, or supplements and age, gender, and lifestyle factors influenced salivary or urinary TAC. Salivary… Show more
“…First, unstimulated whole saliva sample is a better approach than stimulated saliva for measuring these markers. Age, gender, lifestyle and diseases could influence their levels (3) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detecting salivary biomarkers is a promising non-invasive field for screening and diagnosing oral cancer (2,3) . These biomarkers will be more valuable for detecting early epithelial changes especially in high risk individuals (1,2) .…”
Background: Salivary biomarkers are attractive non-invasive tools for screening oral cancer especially in high risk individuals such as smokers. The present study observed the salivary level of microRNA-21 to verify their value as diagnostic marker for smokers.
Methods:The study sample comprised 40 males: 20 non-smokers and 20 smokers. Whole unstimulated saliva samples were collected. The resulting data was analyzed for any statistical significance.
Results:Smokers had statistically significant higher salivary microRNA-21 level than nonsmokers.
Conclusions:Our study demonstrated elevated levels of salivary microRNA-21 in cigarette smokers. Salivary miR-21 could be a promising new diagnostic marker for cigarette smokers. We recommend conducting further studies to investigate its diagnostic value as a marker for oral cancer susceptibility in cigarette smokers.
“…First, unstimulated whole saliva sample is a better approach than stimulated saliva for measuring these markers. Age, gender, lifestyle and diseases could influence their levels (3) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detecting salivary biomarkers is a promising non-invasive field for screening and diagnosing oral cancer (2,3) . These biomarkers will be more valuable for detecting early epithelial changes especially in high risk individuals (1,2) .…”
Background: Salivary biomarkers are attractive non-invasive tools for screening oral cancer especially in high risk individuals such as smokers. The present study observed the salivary level of microRNA-21 to verify their value as diagnostic marker for smokers.
Methods:The study sample comprised 40 males: 20 non-smokers and 20 smokers. Whole unstimulated saliva samples were collected. The resulting data was analyzed for any statistical significance.
Results:Smokers had statistically significant higher salivary microRNA-21 level than nonsmokers.
Conclusions:Our study demonstrated elevated levels of salivary microRNA-21 in cigarette smokers. Salivary miR-21 could be a promising new diagnostic marker for cigarette smokers. We recommend conducting further studies to investigate its diagnostic value as a marker for oral cancer susceptibility in cigarette smokers.
“…It is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide [29]. As quoted by the WHO (2012), "worldwide, 60-90% of school children and nearly 100% of adults have dental cavities, often leading to pain and discomfort".…”
Section: Dental Cariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common types of human's dental diseases are caries, periapical and pulpal inflammation (pulpitis), gingival (gingivitis), periodontal (gumperiodontics) problems, oral infectious diseases, trauma from injuries, and hereditary lesions [41]. The inflammatory process is often associated with free radicaldamage and oxidative stress [39], [24,29]. These diseases are considered as chronic problems and are supposed to be due to interaction between the bacteria in oral cavity (oral flora) and the host.…”
“…Abnormal blood levels of uric acid (hyperuricemia) may be due to alterations in production or excretion, indicating some renal pathophysiology . In contrast, the uric acid has another role in biologic fluids, as an oxidative‐stress non‐enzimatic defense molecule, contributing with approximately 70 % of the salivary total antioxidant capacity .…”
A portable electroanalytical system applied for rapid and simultaneous determination of uric acid (UA) and nitrite (NIT) in human biological fluids (urine, saliva and blood) is reported. The system is based on batch‐injection analysis with multiple‐pulse amperometric (BIA‐MPA) detection using screen‐printed electrodes (SPEs) modified with multi‐walled carbon nanotubes. Sample dilution in optimized electrolyte (0.1 mol L−1 Britton‐Robinson buffer pH 2) followed by injection of 100 μL on the electrode surface using an electronic micropipette is performed. UA is detected at +0.45 V and both UA+NIT at +0.70 V. Linear calibration plots for UA and NIT were obtained over the range of 1–500 μmol L−1 with detection limits of 0.05 and 0.06 μmol L−1, respectively. For comparison, a differential‐pulse voltammetric (DPV) method was optimized, and linear calibration plots for UA and NIT were obtained over range of 1–30 μmol L−1 and 1–40 μmol L−1 with detection limits of 0.1 and 0.3 μmol L−1, respectively. BIA‐MPA is highly precise (RSD<1.3 %), fast (160 h−1) and free from sample‐matrix interferences as recovery values ranged from 77 to 121 % for spiked samples (short contact time of sample aliquot with SPE). Contrarily, recovery tests conducted using DPV did not provide adequate recovery values (>150 %), probably due to the longer contact time of the SPE with the biological samples during analysis leading to a severe interference of sample matrices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.