1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761997000400016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Popular Stains for the Diagnosis of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Field's staining method was used in this study following the protocol of Sivanandam and Mak (1974) with a slight modification of timing where the original 10 to 12 s for malarial staining was extended to 15 to 20 s in the study by Afzan et al, (2010) to optimize staining results for detecting T. gallinae. Castillo and Rojas (1997) reported that Field's stain was more sensitive than Giemsa (78.7% versus70.5%), to diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis. While Afzan et al, (2010) reported that both Giemsa and Field's stain are equally good for detecting T. vaginalis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Field's staining method was used in this study following the protocol of Sivanandam and Mak (1974) with a slight modification of timing where the original 10 to 12 s for malarial staining was extended to 15 to 20 s in the study by Afzan et al, (2010) to optimize staining results for detecting T. gallinae. Castillo and Rojas (1997) reported that Field's stain was more sensitive than Giemsa (78.7% versus70.5%), to diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis. While Afzan et al, (2010) reported that both Giemsa and Field's stain are equally good for detecting T. vaginalis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, histopathology allows one to identify other diseases that show clinical features similar to those of leishmaniasis (14,20). Touch preparations in general give a fair degree of positivity and are less expensive methods, but they can be time-consuming (3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giemsa staining has largely replaced H&E as the diagnostic standard, whereby amastigotes show an intense blue staining pattern 5 . In areas where Giemsa use is limited, such as the endemic region of Colombia, a rapid field stain may serve as a fast and cheap alternative 6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In areas where Giemsa use is limited, such as the endemic region of Colombia, a rapid field stain may serve as a fast and cheap alternative. 6 Even with H&E and Giemsa stains, CL may show parasites on histopathology in only 67% of patients. 7 Because of the presence of non-caseating granulomas, cases may also be mistaken for sarcoidosis or other granulomatous processes when amastigotes are scarce or absent in later stages of disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%