2007
DOI: 10.1080/14613190701689944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Europeanization through EU conditionality: understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Emerson and Tocci 2004;Davutoglu 2009). In this context, Aydin and Acikmese (2007) elaborates in particular on the 'wide ranging political reforms' and the subsequent 'EU conditionality' with a view to explaining and 'understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy'. Moreover, Ankara's economic interests, notably with respect to its eastern neighbours, including its energy strategy and the Caspian oil pipeline issue, have been analysed by many scholars as well as 98 Demetrios A. Theophylactou practitioners who presumably apply the rational choice theory in their analysis (see, Tayfur and Göymen 2002, amongst others).…”
Section: Internal Transformations and External State Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerson and Tocci 2004;Davutoglu 2009). In this context, Aydin and Acikmese (2007) elaborates in particular on the 'wide ranging political reforms' and the subsequent 'EU conditionality' with a view to explaining and 'understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy'. Moreover, Ankara's economic interests, notably with respect to its eastern neighbours, including its energy strategy and the Caspian oil pipeline issue, have been analysed by many scholars as well as 98 Demetrios A. Theophylactou practitioners who presumably apply the rational choice theory in their analysis (see, Tayfur and Göymen 2002, amongst others).…”
Section: Internal Transformations and External State Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By abiding by the EU conditionality, the Kemalist elite, notably the army and the judicial authority, no longer had the monopoly over the formulation of the elected governments’ policies and could not arbitrarily intervene to terminate their mandate in the name of the state secular principles (Çarkoğlu, ) . The accession process ensured not only the party survival as a conservative political party with an Islamic background, but also the implementation of an active and visible foreign policy toward Arab and Muslim states with the aim of solving problems with neighbors (Aydın & Acikmese, ; Sözen, ; Terzi, ).…”
Section: Elitist Duality and The Turkish Foreign Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No caso da Turquia, a modificação dos discursos e práticas de segurança do país seria resultado de um processo de europeização da polí-tica externa turca desde que recebeu status de candidato em 1999 (AYDIN; ACIKMESE, 2007;OZCAN, 2008;ALTUNISIK, 2009), de processos mais gerais de dessecuritização (BILGIN, 2005;ARAS;POLAT, 2008;POLAT, 2010) ou da ascensão ao poder do partido Justiça e Desenvolvimento em 2002, com concepções identitárias e de segurança distintas (MURISON, 2006;DAVUTOGLU, 2010;KALIN, 2011). No entanto, o "abrandamento" das políticas interna e externa turcas e os laços que o país vinha construindo como parte da política de "zero problema com vizinhos" foram sendo progressivamente desgastados após a Primavera Árabe e em particular após a guerra civil na Síria.…”
Section: Fazendo Ou Desfazendo a União Europeia: A Turquia Como Respounclassified