2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudio de enfermedad celíaca en pacientes adultos con diabetes mellitus de tipo 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using HLA typing as a screening strategy in DM1 patients allowed us to diagnose 6 cases with definite CD, which represented a 3% prevalence of CD in this group. Even though this prevalence is 3 times higher than that found in the general population, it is similar to the one found by our group and other researchers when using antibody testing for CD screening only [ 14 , 20 , 21 ]. Therefore, HLA typing in DM1 cases does not seem to have an additional value for the screening of CD in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using HLA typing as a screening strategy in DM1 patients allowed us to diagnose 6 cases with definite CD, which represented a 3% prevalence of CD in this group. Even though this prevalence is 3 times higher than that found in the general population, it is similar to the one found by our group and other researchers when using antibody testing for CD screening only [ 14 , 20 , 21 ]. Therefore, HLA typing in DM1 cases does not seem to have an additional value for the screening of CD in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Since 4 of the 6 patients diagnosed with definite CD showed positive antibodies, HLA typing in our study was only useful in diagnosing 2 patients with CD and negative serology. It should be noted that our DM1 patient sample came from the same population as the patient sample from our previous study, in which CD screening was performed by measuring antibodies [ 14 ]; thus previously diagnosed CD patients were excluded. This might therefore mean that the prevalence of CD in our DM1 population was slightly greater than the prevalence that has been estimated in each of our studies separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dans notre étude, nous avons trouvé une séroprévalence des AAG et/ou AtTG de 29% chez les patients diabétiques de type 1. Ce chiffre est très élevée par rapport aux données de la littérature qui montrent que la prévalence de la MC dans le DT1 est 20 fois plus fréquente que dans la population générale et qu'elle varie en fonction des populations En Europe la prévalence sérologique varie entre 3.6% et 13.4% [710]. En Amérique elle est entre 8 et 11,8% [11, 12] et au Maghreb entre 4 et 16% [1315].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified