2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10836-007-5006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Test Metrics for the Optimisation of Analogue Circuit Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield loss must be taken into account also. Many authors [22][23][24] suggest that, from economical point of view, the low defect level is more important than the low yield loss. It is more expensive to ship a bad circuit than to discard a good one [22].…”
Section: Model-based Test Quality Metrics Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The yield loss must be taken into account also. Many authors [22][23][24] suggest that, from economical point of view, the low defect level is more important than the low yield loss. It is more expensive to ship a bad circuit than to discard a good one [22].…”
Section: Model-based Test Quality Metrics Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the very good idea applied in [23,24,26] instances were not generated from the MC simulation of the CUT but directly from its probabilistic model. In this way a large volume of data was generated extremely fast, in comparison with the MC method.…”
Section: Investigation Of Probabilistic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [4], it is proposed to extract the joint probability density function (PDF) of the output parameters (performances and test measures) of a CUT from an initial sample of about one thousand circuits obtained from Monte Carlo circuit simulation (e.g. Spice or Spectre simulation).…”
Section: Introduction and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of testing, a number of publications deal with analog and mixed-signal circuits [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. For digital circuits most approaches either restrict themselves to special classes of defects [2,9] or assume given probability distributions for parameter variations and defect impacts [10,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%