1967
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1967.tb01887.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors in the clinical assessment of periodontal destruction

Abstract: Pocket depth and loss of attachment were measured twice in millimeters on 1,335 surfaces of 335 teeth in 63 men aged 20‐40 years. The measurements were performed by one examiner. No systematic error in measuring pocket depth and loss of attachment was found. The method error for mean pocket depth was ± 0.10 mm and for mean loss of attachment ± 0.11 mm. The method error for single measurements was ± 0.36 mm and ± 0.41, respectively. This shows that the millimeter is an appropriate unit for measuring pocket dept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
194
2
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
12
194
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients were categorized as having healthy periodontium or chronic generalised periodontitis based on bleeding on probing, gingival index (GI) 18) , pocket depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) 13) scores together with radiograph evidence of bone loss. A GI score of 0, PD≤3 mm, CAL=0, and no evidence of bone loss on a radiograph was considered to indicate a healthy periodontium.…”
Section: Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were categorized as having healthy periodontium or chronic generalised periodontitis based on bleeding on probing, gingival index (GI) 18) , pocket depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) 13) scores together with radiograph evidence of bone loss. A GI score of 0, PD≤3 mm, CAL=0, and no evidence of bone loss on a radiograph was considered to indicate a healthy periodontium.…”
Section: Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each patient, the following clinical parameters were recorded on 6 points per tooth mesio-mid and distobuccal, mesio-mid and disto-lingual: (1) Periodontal probing depth (PD) as described by Glavind & Löe (1967 (Löe & Silness, 1963;Silness & Löe, 1964). The scores from 0 to 3 are as follows: Score 0 ¼ Gingival areas of tooth free from plaque, Score 1 ¼ No plaque was observed in-situ by the unaided eye, but plaque is made visible on the tip of a probe after it has been moved over the tooth surface at the entrance of the gingival crevice, Score 2 ¼ Gingival area covered by a thin to moderately thick layer of plaque visible to the naked eye.…”
Section: Clinical Variables Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects in the age group of 25-45 years; presence of at least 20 natural teeth, subjects with a diagnosis of CP based on clinical parameters like probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) [28], gingival index (GI) [29]; subjects having BMI, in non obese subjects in the range of 18.5 22.9 kg/m 2 and in obese subjects 25 kg/m 2 and waist circumference (WC) 90 cm in men and 80 cm in women [30], were selected in this study. Radiographic bone loss was recorded dichotomously (presence or absence) to differentiate subjects with CP from other groups.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%