2013
DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2012.754947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equity and difference in centralized policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These trends in Australia are echoes of similar trends in other parts of the world, leading to what has been termed 'policy borrowing' (Lingard, 2010), influenced by the globalized, neoliberal policy climate (Rizvi & Lingard, 2010). Many educational researchers have noted commonalities in this policy-borrowing pattern, including: (a) greater focus on English literacy and numeracy in the curriculum at the expense of other subjects and hence, various forms of narrowing of the curriculum (Berliner, 2011;Darling-Hammond, 2010;Milner, 2013;Stobart, 2008); (b) reliance on standardized tests to compare and rank students, teachers and schools (Lingard, 2010;Smeed, 2010); (c) reduced trust in teacher autonomy and judgement (Crocco & Costigan, 2007;Macedo, 2013); and (d) strengthening of human capital discourse in discussions about the purposes of schooling (Comber & Nixon, 2009;Lingard, 2010). Of particular interest in relation to the work that we present in this article, is the effects of a narrowing of curriculum on the opportunities that students have to theorize and philosophize using a variety of 'literacies' or modes of communication, including the graphic and narrative.…”
Section: The Place Of Art In the Curriculum: Debates And Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These trends in Australia are echoes of similar trends in other parts of the world, leading to what has been termed 'policy borrowing' (Lingard, 2010), influenced by the globalized, neoliberal policy climate (Rizvi & Lingard, 2010). Many educational researchers have noted commonalities in this policy-borrowing pattern, including: (a) greater focus on English literacy and numeracy in the curriculum at the expense of other subjects and hence, various forms of narrowing of the curriculum (Berliner, 2011;Darling-Hammond, 2010;Milner, 2013;Stobart, 2008); (b) reliance on standardized tests to compare and rank students, teachers and schools (Lingard, 2010;Smeed, 2010); (c) reduced trust in teacher autonomy and judgement (Crocco & Costigan, 2007;Macedo, 2013); and (d) strengthening of human capital discourse in discussions about the purposes of schooling (Comber & Nixon, 2009;Lingard, 2010). Of particular interest in relation to the work that we present in this article, is the effects of a narrowing of curriculum on the opportunities that students have to theorize and philosophize using a variety of 'literacies' or modes of communication, including the graphic and narrative.…”
Section: The Place Of Art In the Curriculum: Debates And Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This language tells us that some children are being defined as 'left behind' (Macedo, 2013), and it is DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION the schools that are guilty of this betrayal. The schools have abandoned some children behind the enemy lines of ignorance.…”
Section: Democracy and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo com os teóricos desconstrucionistas, o currículo é subsumido pela diferença (MACEDO, 2013;2017;MILLER, 2014). O pós-estruturalismo interroga correntes que defendem o centralismo em identidades humanistas e incontaminadas, assim como teorias que agenciam "o projeto de reconhecimento do sujeito em sua cultura, em sua sociedade, em comunidades racionais" (MACEDO, 2017, p. 545).…”
Section: Currículo E Diferençaunclassified