2015
DOI: 10.1590/00115258201559
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: O presente artigo avalia, sob a base do conceito de igualdade de oportunidades, a coerência das políticas de cotas ProUni e FIES como geradoras de equidade no acesso ao ensino superior. Essas políticas têm em comum o fato de destinarem-se a parcelas específicas do alunado. Na rede privada, onde estão 75% do alunado, 18% acessam as políticas públicas de incentivo ao ingresso. A rede pública oferece vagas gratuitas e cerca de 10% dos alunos são cotistas. Segundo o critério de igualdade de oportunidades, a políti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these measures have limitations, given that the quota policy is restricted to public education, students shoulder disproportionate costs to their conditions under the FIES, and the ProUni, which is restricted to tax exemption linked to the scholarships granted, has expanded much less than the demand. 31,36 It is possible to adjust the academic metrics to increase socioeconomic, racial and ethnic diversity among undergraduate students of medicine. 37 By analyzing the motivations for choosing the medical profession, it can be noted that there was a prevailing consent for humanitarian issues among the new graduates, such as "helping people", "doing good" and the "physician/patient relationship".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O objetivo maior, reparação histórica e social, assim como a maior igualdade de acesso à educação superior repercutem não só nos indivíduos e instituições, mas refletem e dinamizam a sociedade. De forma geral os artigos citam os reflexos coletivos dessas ações numa predição de melhoria social com menores desigualdades (Barros et al, 2015;da Silva et al, 2014;dos Passos, 2015;dos Santos et al, 2008;Kern & Zilotto, 2011;Rossetto & Gonçalves, 2015;Silva, 2016;Trevisol & Nierotka, 2016, etc.). Alguns artigos questionam a efetividade das políticas afirmativas, pois teriam caráter focal e sintomático (Neves & Lima, 2007) sem a necessária reformulação da base educacional que traria ao último grau da educação déficits e dificuldades que os precedem, não abrindo o real acesso a educação superior a todos Cohen et al, 2016;Paixão et al, 2015).…”
Section: Eficiência E Eficácia Das Ações Afirmativas Nas Ies?unclassified
“…The formal evaluation from CAPES, and later analyzed in this paper, has been used in policy making and consists of an explicit criteria for granting scholarships to deprived families with the aim to subsidize higher education and improve equality of access (de Souza Rossetto and de Oliveira Gonçalves, 2015). The program FIES-SISU was set up in the late 2000s and explicitly favored granting funds to private universities located in the North, Northeast, and Center-West (Sinaes, 2014).…”
Section: The Process Of Evaluation Of Postgraduate Programs In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,260/2001. To be eligible for funding under this program, students must be enrolled in undergraduate programs with a good score in the evaluation processes conducted by the Ministry of Education.8 In the case of Prouni and Fies, the policies were implemented by the federal government from 2005 to 2007, also as a result of interests of private higher education institutions(Rossetto;Gonçalves, 2015).Educação & Realidade, PortoAlegre, v. 44, n. 3, e81653, 2019.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3. Called Reestruturação e Expansão das Universidades Federais (REUNI), this government action helped to increase the number of enrollments in public institutions by 85% (Rossetto & Gonçalves, 2015). At least 10% of the students enrolled in public universities were accepted through affirmative action programs (Secretaria de Educação Superior [SESU], 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%