2009
DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x09005294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental and population externalities

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the main emphasis in theoretical works has traditionally been placed on the extra stress generated by population growth on the limited availability of land and natural resources (see, among others, Solow, ; Cigno, ; Nerlove, ; Dasgupta, ; Peretto and Valente, ), while most of the empirical works have focused on the impacts of population changes on environmental quality or pollution (Kaya, ; Rosa and Dietz, ). An important conclusion of such an empirical literature is related to the fact that environmental deterioration depends not only on economic activities (eventually net of green technological progress) but also on human population; however, among the few theoretical works that relate population growth to environmental quality (Harford, ; Schou, ; Jöst and Quaas, ), none addresses the specific role of population as a separate (from economic activities) driver of pollutant emissions, as suggested by the empirical evidence on the IPAT equation (Rosa and Dietz, ). We thus contribute also to this limited branch of the literature by developing a more comprehensive approach to the role of population growth as a source of environmental degradation per se.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the main emphasis in theoretical works has traditionally been placed on the extra stress generated by population growth on the limited availability of land and natural resources (see, among others, Solow, ; Cigno, ; Nerlove, ; Dasgupta, ; Peretto and Valente, ), while most of the empirical works have focused on the impacts of population changes on environmental quality or pollution (Kaya, ; Rosa and Dietz, ). An important conclusion of such an empirical literature is related to the fact that environmental deterioration depends not only on economic activities (eventually net of green technological progress) but also on human population; however, among the few theoretical works that relate population growth to environmental quality (Harford, ; Schou, ; Jöst and Quaas, ), none addresses the specific role of population as a separate (from economic activities) driver of pollutant emissions, as suggested by the empirical evidence on the IPAT equation (Rosa and Dietz, ). We thus contribute also to this limited branch of the literature by developing a more comprehensive approach to the role of population growth as a source of environmental degradation per se.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Harford's proposal [66][67][68] raises some controversies in terms of how to operationalize such a tax in countries with high poverty rates and where parents have to pay for education at all levels [71]. A similar proposal was put forward by Jost and Quaas [72], who propose to tax the family size in the case of dynastic families with altruism, and to levy a tax on births in the case of microhouseholds. to reach optimality.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research that used the IPAT model was usually related to greenhouse gas emissions (Alcott ; Chertow ; Dietz and Rosa ; Gans and Jöst ; Jöst and Quaas ; Myers ; Shi ), affluence by per capita gross domestic product (GDP) (Y/P), and the state of technology was approximated by the amount of pollutants per unit of GDP. If we take the logarithm of equation and the derivatives with respect to time to get the mean relative change of the environmental impact, we would find that it is equal to the sum of the average change of pollutant per unit of GDP, average change of per capita GDP, and average change in population size, respectively (equation ).…”
Section: The Stirpat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%