2017 IEEE Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wifs.2017.8267642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced free-text keystroke continuous authentication based on dynamics of wrist motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a behavioral biometrics which has the advantage of not requiring additional sensor than the keyboard. This biometric modality also allows continuous authentication through time [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a behavioral biometrics which has the advantage of not requiring additional sensor than the keyboard. This biometric modality also allows continuous authentication through time [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheme was evaluated using Bayes Net (BN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and RF classifiers on a dataset of 11 subjects and achieved a TAR 82.34%. Li et al [105] proposed a continuous authentication scheme based on free-text keystroke that exploited both keystroke latency patterns and wrist motion behaviors acquired by wrist-worn smartwatches. A Dynamic Trust Model (DTM) is developed to fuse two one-vs-all RF ensemble classifiers and achieved a TAR of 98.12% on 25 subjects.…”
Section: Footstepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morales et al [16] used the scoring normalization technique to effectively improve the authentication accuracy of the KD authentication system. Li et al [17] presented authentication approach by incorporating the dynamics of both free-text keystroke latency features and statistical wrist motion patterns extracted from the wrist worn smartwatches, and dynamic trust model (DTM) was developed to fuse two one-vs-all Random Forest Ensemble Classifiers (RFECs). e result was that an impostor or intruder was detected within no more than one sentence (average 56 keystrokes) with the FRR of 1.82% and the FAR of 1.94%.…”
Section: Kdmentioning
confidence: 99%