2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep25942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering 3D bicontinuous hierarchically macro-mesoporous LiFePO4/C nanocomposite for lithium storage with high rate capability and long cycle stability

Abstract: A highly crystalline three dimensional (3D) bicontinuous hierarchically macro-mesoporous LiFePO4/C nanocomposite constructed by nanoparticles in the range of 50~100 nm via a rapid microwave assisted solvothermal process followed by carbon coating have been synthesized as cathode material for high performance lithium-ion batteries. The abundant 3D macropores allow better penetration of electrolyte to promote Li+ diffusion, the mesopores provide more electrochemical reaction sites and the carbon layers outside L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…N peak appears at 2.63 V (characteristic of Fe 3+ in Fe 2 O 3 ), indicating that all the iron atoms in the LiFePO 4 /C composite are Fe 2+ [40]. The two peaks around at 3.34 and 3.53 V (vs. Li + /Li) are attributed to the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox reaction, which corresponds to lithium extraction and insertion in LiFePO 4 crystal structure [41]. Furthermore, the two peaks show a narrow potential separation of 0.19 V and exhibit good symmetric and poignant shape, which imply a good electrochemical performance for lithium ion batteries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…N peak appears at 2.63 V (characteristic of Fe 3+ in Fe 2 O 3 ), indicating that all the iron atoms in the LiFePO 4 /C composite are Fe 2+ [40]. The two peaks around at 3.34 and 3.53 V (vs. Li + /Li) are attributed to the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox reaction, which corresponds to lithium extraction and insertion in LiFePO 4 crystal structure [41]. Furthermore, the two peaks show a narrow potential separation of 0.19 V and exhibit good symmetric and poignant shape, which imply a good electrochemical performance for lithium ion batteries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak position shifts and the potential separation between two peaks broadens gradually as the scan rate increases. Previous literature has reported that the diffusion coefficient of lithium ions (D Li ) can be determined from a linear relationship between peak currents (i p ) and the square root of the scan rate (v 1/2 ) based on the Randles–Sevcik equation [41,42,43]: Ip=2.69×105n3/2ACD1/2v1/2 where I p (A) is the current maximum, n is the number of electrons transfer per mole (n = 1), F (C/mol) is the Faraday constant, A (cm 2 ) is the electrode area (1.77 cm 2 ), C (mol/cm 3 ) is the lithium concentration in the LiFePO 4 /C composite, v (V/s) is the scanning rate, D Li (cm 2 /s) is the lithium diffusion coefficient, R (J/K·mol) is the gas constant, and T (K) is the temperature. Figure 4c shows the linear relationship between peak currents (I p ) and the square root of the scan rate (v 1/2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perkembangan terbaru menunjukkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan unjuk kerja baterai ion litium terutama konduktivitas listrik, tidak hanya mencampurkan bahan berkonduktivitas tinggi saja, namun juga ditentukan oleh cara, konstruksi dan arsitektur yang dibangun oleh berbagai bahan secara kompleks, bahkan sampai pada skala nanometer [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Bahan aktif lain untuk anoda seperti kobalkobal oksida, nikel oksida dan tembaga oksida juga memberikan hasil yang selaras [10,39,53]. Untuk bahan silikon, percobaan Sternad dkk membuktikan bahwa struktur yang terorientasi memberikan unjuk kerja yang lebih baik [12].…”
Section: Penggunaan Bahan Aktifunclassified
“…The high cycle stability mainly depends on the structural stability of the electrode material at different charge and discharge current rates [ 19 , 20 ]. For LFP cathode material, both volume shrinkage (charge/lithium ion deintercalation) and expansion (discharge/lithium ion intercalation) will lead to structural damage and thus cause capacity decline [ 21 ]. It is demonstrated that the suitable coating layer with porous structure can effectively improve the structural stability of the active material by buffering volume change [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%