2010
DOI: 10.3386/w15939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Conservation "Nudges" and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment

Abstract: We thank Maximilian Auffhammer, the participants at the 2010 POWER Conference, and seminar participants at Princeton and the University of Illinois for comments. We thank the UCLA Ziman Real Estate Center for funding. We thank the editors and five reviewers for their comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerrevi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
149
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
8
149
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the same experiment was run using students in Romania, no such positive effects were observed because the Romanians did not sanction bad behavior in the PGG (84). Similarly, providing feedback on how one's energy use compares with one's neighbors had reduced consumption among American liberals but may have had the opposite effect among conservatives (80). Studying the interaction between norms and institutional policies is an important direction for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when the same experiment was run using students in Romania, no such positive effects were observed because the Romanians did not sanction bad behavior in the PGG (84). Similarly, providing feedback on how one's energy use compares with one's neighbors had reduced consumption among American liberals but may have had the opposite effect among conservatives (80). Studying the interaction between norms and institutional policies is an important direction for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, this body of work provides clear evidence that reputational incentives can be a powerful force for increasing cooperation in the field. Our paper in particular adds to efforts aimed at promoting energy conservation via nonfinancial incentives, such as providing people information about their own energy use and how it compares with the energy use of their neighbors (79)(80)(81)(82).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater transparency may enable private and corporate occupiers to take energy efficiency into account when making housing decisions. Recent evidence shows that providing feedback to private consumers with respect to their energy consumption is an effective "nudge" to improve energy efficiency [4,8]. From an economic perspective, the energy label could have financial utility for both real estate investors and tenants, as the energy savings resulting from more efficient building may result in lower operating costs and higher property values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the differences could be due to strict neoclassical preference heterogeneity. Indeed, there is significant evidence that agents have varying preferences for individually provided public goods (Saphores, Nixon, Gounseitan, and Shapiro (2007) and Costa and Kahn (2011)). Second, variation inṼ could embed heterogeneity in social norms throughout an economy, such as in Benabou and Tirole (2006).…”
Section: Modeling Preference Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons why accounting for private provision of public goods could affect the design of policy. First, there are a variety of results showing that different individuals in the economy have different values for their own public good provision (for example Costa and Kahn (2011) and Jacobsen, Kotchen, and Vandenbergh (2012)). 2 Second, reasons such as warm glow, moral suasion and impure altruism have all been shown to exist in both the lab and the field (Andreoni (1989), Levitt and List (2007)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%