2015
DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2015.1074087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergent Team Roles in Organizational Meetings: Identifying Communication Patterns via Cluster Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another problem is that most research about team roles relied on self-assessment, participants' assessment, and less often on peer rating or personality tests, whereas only a few studies used observation as the main method of data collection [43].…”
Section: Gaps In the Body Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another problem is that most research about team roles relied on self-assessment, participants' assessment, and less often on peer rating or personality tests, whereas only a few studies used observation as the main method of data collection [43].…”
Section: Gaps In the Body Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the communicative approach developed by [43]. This suggests that team roles are produced and shaped in communicative behaviour, through interaction patterns.…”
Section: Communicative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of group interaction dynamics following meeting lateness, we focus on negative socioemotional communication. From a communication perspective, negative socioemotional behaviors are indicative of a bad team climate and entail specific communicative acts such as interrupting one another, engaging in side conversations, criticizing others, or backbiting (e.g., Lehmann-Willenbrock, Beck, & Kauffeld, 2016;Lehmann-Willenbrock & Kauffeld, 2010). Interruptions occur when a conversational turn cannot be finished because a speech act is cut off by another speaker (e.g., Goldberg, 1990).…”
Section: Effects Of Lateness On Group Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um dos argumentos mencionados pelos gestores para não realização de reuniões é a falta de motivação de seus integrantes com os objetivos e assuntos abordados. De fato, as reuniões frequentemente servem para a maioria dos membros de organizações falarem de problemas, sem a preocupação de apresentar as necessárias soluções 30 . Além do ambiente fomentar que os envolvidos se sintam seguros em compartilhar seus assuntos 31 , as reuniões poderiam ter menor duração e ser mais frequentes para facilitar o contato dos envolvidos 32 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified