2021
DOI: 10.1145/3443686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embracing Four Tensions in Human-Computer Interaction Research with Marginalized People

Abstract: Human-computer interaction has a long history of working with marginalized people. We sought to understand how HCI researchers navigate work that engages with marginalized people and considerations researchers might work through to expand benefits and mitigate potential harms. In total, 24 HCI researchers, located primarily in the United States, participated in an interview, survey, or both. Through a reflexive thematic analysis, we identified four tensions—exploitation, membership, disclosure, and allyship. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term 'marginalized' is used throughout this paper instead of 'underserved', 'underrepresented', or 'vulnerable'. Our paper reflects the view that the term 'marginalized' better reflects "a failing of society, rather than a failing of any individual person" [82]. Nonetheless, we acknowledge it can be problematic to ascribe any term to a community from outside the community [129].…”
Section: Debates About Participationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term 'marginalized' is used throughout this paper instead of 'underserved', 'underrepresented', or 'vulnerable'. Our paper reflects the view that the term 'marginalized' better reflects "a failing of society, rather than a failing of any individual person" [82]. Nonetheless, we acknowledge it can be problematic to ascribe any term to a community from outside the community [129].…”
Section: Debates About Participationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The exact role to be created for community members is variable depending on the context of the project, but the role for the researcher in these approaches is clearly intended as a reflective, engaged participant and not a distanced scientist. Liang et al [82] identify tensions for HCI researchers working with marginalized groups that may guide such reflections, focusing on the nature of engagement with community partners (whether engagement is extractive or tokenizes identities), membership of researchers in the community, disclosure of researcher stance, and the nature of allyship in the pursuit of social change.…”
Section: Reflexive Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide context to our inquiry and analysis, we are including details on author background and positions [6,47,64]. The frst author has extensive experience both as a formally trained professional laboratory biologist and as community biolab member and manager.…”
Section: Positionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize these kinds of harms, researchers have called for new approaches and methodologies that account for historical contexts and systems of oppression (e.g. [7,25,32,40,48,58,64]). In this section, following feminist methodology, we reflect on our approach to this research and the ways in which our positions in the world, our goals, and our beliefs shape our interpretation of the findings [7].…”
Section: Research Approach and Researcher Positionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%