2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1852083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron trapping and detrapping in ion-beam-damaged diamond surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C1s peak of the UNCD sample is observed at 286.65 eV, which is shifted by 1.05 eV higher than the normal C1s peak 15 ͑the blueshift͒, and is possibly due to the surface charging or oxidation of UNCD, which implies the existence of electron trapping centers in these films. 24,25 We have not found any significant N1s peak from the ion-implanted UNCD films during the measurement. This is probably due to the large penetration depth of implanted ions, such that the N is residing inside the films at a level far below the sensitivity of the XPS measurement.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The C1s peak of the UNCD sample is observed at 286.65 eV, which is shifted by 1.05 eV higher than the normal C1s peak 15 ͑the blueshift͒, and is possibly due to the surface charging or oxidation of UNCD, which implies the existence of electron trapping centers in these films. 24,25 We have not found any significant N1s peak from the ion-implanted UNCD films during the measurement. This is probably due to the large penetration depth of implanted ions, such that the N is residing inside the films at a level far below the sensitivity of the XPS measurement.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Trapping of charges in the defect states is the probable reason for the increase in surface charging and the additional C1s blueshift after ion implantation. 24,25 In contrast, the C1s peak shifts in the reverse direction to lower the binding energies, suggesting the onset of formation of disordered carbon at an implantation dose of 10 13 ions/ cm 2 ͑N 13 sample͒. The presence of disordered carbon eliminates the atomic defects ͑the electron trapping centers͒, reducing the surface charge.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hot carriers thermalize within a few ps to states near the conduction and valence band minima, where they diffuse before recombining by radiative or non-radiative processes. Some carriers are trapped by surface or point defects [28]. For 2 keV electrons, the pair generation rate peaks ∼20 nm below the surface at ∼1.8 × 10 10 nA −1 nm s. Higher energy electrons generate more carriers, but they also penetrate more deeply into the lattice, resulting in a lower carrier creation density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the implantation of N ions into UNCD film can cause the removal of H from the film, 8 exposing the dangling bonds, which also possibly contribute for the C 1s blueshift. 22,23 Higher C 1s blueshift for M 200 film suggests that it contains more abundant atomic defects or defect complexes as compared with the S 100 and the M 50 films. The defects induced variation in full width at half maximum ͑FWHM͒ of C 1s spectra 12 is also evident from the figures, which further support the above arguments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%